These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

4259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6927910)

  • 41. Transmolar pin and magnetic carrier for midfacial reconstruction: a clinical report.
    La Velle W; Arcuri M; Panje W; Jons R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Sep; 70(3):204-6. PubMed ID: 8410725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Survey of currently used materials for fabrication of extraoral maxillofacial prostheses in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia.
    Montgomery PC; Kiat-Amnuay S
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):482-90. PubMed ID: 20002975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Fabrication of perforated silicone rubber implant.
    Raval P; Schaaf NG; Kielich M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Apr; 45(4):449-51. PubMed ID: 6939852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Immediate maxillofacial prosthodontic rehabilitation after radical mid-face tumor resection.
    Cheng AC; Morrison D; Wee AG
    J Prosthodont; 1997 Dec; 6(4):265-7. PubMed ID: 9563326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Selective laser sintering technology for customized fabrication of facial prostheses.
    Wu G; Zhou B; Bi Y; Zhao Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 100(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 18589076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Total nasal prosthesis after resection of a recurrence of skin carcinoma on a forehead flap in a post-rhinectomy site.
    Benech A; Arcuri F; Nicolotti M; Crespi MC; Pia F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e627-8. PubMed ID: 23172502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Prosthetic use of plastinated facial structures: a feasibility study.
    Parel SM; Bickley H; Holt GR; Shuler S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Apr; 49(4):529-31. PubMed ID: 6573500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Simplified fabrication of orbital prostheses using posterior attachment for the artificial eye.
    Shifman A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Jan; 69(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 8455172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Direct 3D Printing of Flexible Nasal Prosthesis: Optimized Digital Workflow from Scan to Fit.
    Nuseir A; Hatamleh MM; Alnazzawi A; Al-Rabab'ah M; Kamel B; Jaradat E
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 30461125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A hybrid-mold technique for fabricating facial prostheses.
    Chambers MS; Lemon JC; Martin JW; Wesley PJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jan; 75(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 8850452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Modified technique to improve fabrication and outcome of definitive orbital prosthesis.
    Aggarwal H; Kumar P; Singh SV
    Orbit; 2016; 35(2):66-8. PubMed ID: 26889563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Prosthetic rehabilitation of an external auricle defect with silicone rubber using extrinsic staining.
    Sun T; Shao L; Zhao Y
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):e302-5. PubMed ID: 23715000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Technique for magnet replacement in silicone facial prostheses.
    Lemon JC; Martin JW; Chambers MS; Wesley PJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Feb; 73(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 7722933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Temporary nasal prosthesis rehabilitation: a clinical report.
    Toljanic JA; Lee J; Bedard JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Oct; 82(4):384-6. PubMed ID: 10512955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Titanium mesh in reconstructive surgery of the nasal pyramid. Follow-up of our 11 initial cases.
    Otero-Rivas MM; González-Sixto B; Alonso-Alonso T; Pérez-Bustillo A; Valladares-Narganes LM; Rodríguez-Prieto MÁ
    Int J Dermatol; 2015 Aug; 54(8):961-5. PubMed ID: 26183244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Universal simplified mold technique for construction of facial prostheses.
    Zini I; Zaki HS; Aramany MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Jul; 40(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 277685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Updates on the Construction of an Eyeglass-Supported Nasal Prosthesis Using Computer-Aided Design and Rapid Prototyping Technology.
    Ciocca L; Tarsitano A; Marchetti C; Scotti R
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Jan; 25(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 26288248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation.
    King GE
    J Oral Surg; 1971 Nov; 29(11):805-11. PubMed ID: 5286536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Selective-pressure impression technique for nasal prostheses.
    Shifman A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Sep; 58(3):349-51. PubMed ID: 3476739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Recently developed elastomers for facial prostheses.
    Gonzalez JB
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1978 Jul; 53(7):423-31. PubMed ID: 661380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 213.