These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6928386)
1. The antitrust laws, the Federal Trade Commission, and cost containment. Havighurst CL Bull N Y Acad Med; 1980; 56(1):169-79. PubMed ID: 6928386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Supreme Court, antitrust and the health care field. Health Law Vigil; 1982 Oct; 5(22):1-14. PubMed ID: 10257142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Antitrust in the health services industry: the first five years. Dolan AK Health Med Care Serv Rev; 1981-1982; 3(2-3):13, 15-24. PubMed ID: 10299261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. U.S. Supreme Court rejects case-by-case antitrust analysis in Maricopa. McCann RW Health Law Vigil; 1982 Jun; 5(13):1-4. PubMed ID: 10256005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Antitrust, restraint of trade, and unfair business practices. Impact on physicians. Heitler G J Leg Med; 1982 Sep; 3(3):443-60. PubMed ID: 6983550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bill would stop FTC probes of health care price fixing. McIntyre KJ Bus Insur; 1982 Jun; 16(26):2, 99. PubMed ID: 10255880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The federal antitrust laws--a primer for physicians. Francisco CJ Tex Med; 1989 Mar; 85(3):56-8. PubMed ID: 2711351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Collecting and distributing price and cost information. Hannah HW J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1984 Jun; 184(11):1342. PubMed ID: 6735853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. FTC-DOJ report affirms value of health care competition. Kertesz L AHIP Cover; 2004; 45(6):13, 71-3. PubMed ID: 15700871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Arizona v. Maricopa County: a stern antitrust warning to healthcare providers. Halper HR Healthc Financ Manage; 1982 Oct; 36(10):38-42. PubMed ID: 10315212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Free choice" as a restraint of trade in American health care delivery and insurance. Weller CD Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1985 May; 7(3):5-46. PubMed ID: 10300085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Antitrust enforcement in the medical services industry: what does it all mean? Havighurst CC Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1980; 58(1):89-124. PubMed ID: 6903786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Avoiding antitrust snags requires forethought and thorough market analysis. Engstrom P Med Netw Strategy Rep; 1995 May; 4(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 10153138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Top court rulings could affect health costs. Fisher MJ Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1982 Jun; 86(26):8-9. PubMed ID: 10255728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Federal Trade Commission sets about reducing costs of "health care industry". Lawrence SV Forum Med; 1979 Jan; 2(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10239722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Med society hit with antitrust suit. Med World News; 1979 Sep; 20(18):19-20. PubMed ID: 10243628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. U.S. Supreme Court and Federal Trade Commission determine medicine is not a profession. Decision affects patient care. Gale AH Mo Med; 1997 Jul; 94(7):319-20. PubMed ID: 9223900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Federal Trade Commission and health. Conn Med; 1977 Nov; 41(11):697-703. PubMed ID: 913104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]