These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6928959)
1. Diminishing dependence on adhesives for retention of facial prostheses. Parel SM J Prosthet Dent; 1980 May; 43(5):552-60. PubMed ID: 6928959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Naturally occurring undercuts in the retention of an interim oculofacial prosthesis. Driscoll CF; Hughes B; Ostrowski JS J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):652-4. PubMed ID: 1403945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation in the UK: a survey of maxillofacial prosthetists' and technologists' attitudes and opinions. Hatamleh MM; Haylock C; Watson J; Watts DC Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 39(12):1186-92. PubMed ID: 20832245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical and systems approach facilitating facial prosthesis production. De Freece AB J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Jan; 41(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 281526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multiple tray technique for implant-retained orbital prostheses. Salinas TJ; Penchas J; Prada-Valverde V; Guerra LR J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Feb; 73(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 7722931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fabrication of facial prostheses by applying the osseointegration concept for retention. Seals RR; Cortes AL; Parel SM J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jun; 61(6):712-6. PubMed ID: 2724165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osseointegration in maxillofacial prosthetics. Part II: Extraoral applications. Parel SM; Branemark PI; Tjellstrom A; Gion G J Prosthet Dent; 1986 May; 55(5):600-6. PubMed ID: 3458911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Universal simplified mold technique for construction of facial prostheses. Zini I; Zaki HS; Aramany MA J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Jul; 40(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 277685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The complex facial prosthesis. The value of bone-anchored maxillofacial prostheses in the treatment of extensive loss of facial tissue]. Palmer S; Brix M; Bénateau H Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2001 Aug; 102(5):261-5. PubMed ID: 11599147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simplified fabrication of orbital prostheses using posterior attachment for the artificial eye. Shifman A J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Jan; 69(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 8455172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FACIAL PROSTHESES. MCCONNELL DV; NIXON M Plast Reconstr Surg; 1964 Mar; 33():278-87. PubMed ID: 14131626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Maxillofacial prosthetics: rehabilitation of head and neck cancer patients (III). Vergo TJ; Andrews R Quintessence Dent Technol; 1984; 8(7):427-32. PubMed ID: 6593770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Problems of epithetic concerns of facial defects]. Renk A Zahnarztl Mitt; 1990 Mar; 80(6):590, 592, 594 passim. PubMed ID: 2238903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of a surgical positioner for bone-anchored facial prostheses. Reisberg DJ; Habakuk SW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):376-9. PubMed ID: 9197103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retention and processing methods of nasal prosthesis. Goiato MC; Mancuso DN; Zuccolotti BC; Murakawa AC; Lima DC; Santos DM; Andreotti AM J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2012 Nov; 22(11):716-9. PubMed ID: 23146853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]