144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6929885)
21. Audiological management of noise induced hearing loss.
Arslan E; Orzan E
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1998; 48():131-45. PubMed ID: 9505306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Findings of standard and high-frequency audiometry in workers exposed to occupational noise for long durations].
Türkkahraman S; Gök U; Karlidağ T; Keleş E; Oztürk A
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2003 Apr; 10(4):137-42. PubMed ID: 12941983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [From the expert's office: When is a hearing loss in the high tone range with coexisting hearing loss in all frequencies consequence of professional noise exposure? Frequent false evaluation of consultants, consulting physicians and professional unions].
Brusis T
Laryngorhinootologie; 2015 Jan; 94(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 25569465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Are false-positive rates leading to an overestimation of noise-induced hearing loss?
Schlauch RS; Carney E
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Apr; 54(2):679-92. PubMed ID: 20844255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The challenge of detecting minimal hearing loss in audiometric surveys.
Schlauch RS; Carney E
Am J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 21(1):106-19. PubMed ID: 22271907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Agreement between auditory threshold calculated from cortical evoked response audiometry and tone audiometry in occupational hearing loss].
Janisch R; Jerábek J
Cesk Otolaryngol; 1990 Aug; 39(4):234-41. PubMed ID: 2289246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Occupational hearing loss (author's transl)].
Seiler CF
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Jul; 59(7):438-41. PubMed ID: 7453443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pure tone audiograms from hearing-impaired children. I. A statistical approach to summarizing audiogram information.
Bamford JM; Wilson IM; Atkinson D; Bench RJ
Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 7466281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Behaviour of high-frequency hearing in noise.
Dieroff HG
Audiology; 1982; 21(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 7055483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Predicting hearing thresholds and occupational hearing loss with multiple-frequency auditory steady-state responses.
Hsu RF; Ho CK; Lu SN; Chen SS
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Oct; 39(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 20828512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Course of the audiometric threshold in relation to the age in chronic acoustic trauma].
Albera R
Med Lav; 1997; 88(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 9312663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Audiometric evaluation in extended high frequencies of individuals exposed to occupational noise].
Porto MA; Gahyva DL; Lauris JR; Lopes AC
Pro Fono; 2004; 16(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 15609579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Differentiation of slight differences in tone frequency in subjects with perceptive hearing impairment (author's transl)].
Gryczyński M
Otolaryngol Pol; 1981; 35(4-6):349-58. PubMed ID: 7342019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Relations between the discriminatory curve in the speech audiogram and tone audiometric measurement data (author's transl)].
Tymnik G; Kessler L; Koch R
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1982 Mar; 61(3):135-7. PubMed ID: 7098704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss.
van der Drift JF; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
Audiology; 1987; 26(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3593096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Application of extended high frequency audiometry in the early diagnosis of noise--induced hearing loss].
Wang Y; Yang B; Li Y; Hou L; Hu Y; Han Y
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Feb; 35(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 12768684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Latencies of reaction indicating disturbed behaviour during evaluation of pure tone threshold (author's transl)].
Kumpf W
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 May; 60(5):259-63. PubMed ID: 7231014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Efficient hearing screening in noise-exposed listeners using the digit triplet test.
Jansen S; Luts H; Dejonckere P; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 23782715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss.
Hone SW; Norman G; Keogh I; Kelly V
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Feb; 128(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 12601323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Methodological issues when comparing hearing thresholds of a group with population standards: the case of the ferry engineers.
Dobie RA
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):526-37. PubMed ID: 16957502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
