These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6930157)

  • 1. Exclusions and attributions of paternity: practical experiences of forensic genetics and statistics.
    Valentin J
    Am J Hum Genet; 1980 May; 32(3):420-31. PubMed ID: 6930157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expected and observed proportion of subjects excluded from paternity by blood phenotypes of a child and its mother in a sample of 171 families.
    Salmon D; Seger J; Salmon C
    Am J Hum Genet; 1980 May; 32(3):432-44. PubMed ID: 6930158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Formalisation parental genotype recognition for the computation of probability of paternity (author's transl)].
    Salmon D
    Ann Genet; 1981; 24(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 6977296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of paternity. The use of HLA and red cell antigens.
    Davey FR; Hubbell CA; Lauenstein KJ; Tinnesz C; Henry JB
    Transfusion; 1984; 24(4):340-2. PubMed ID: 6464160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blood groups and genetic markers polymorphism and probability of paternity.
    Salmon D; Salmon C
    Transfusion; 1980; 20(6):684-94. PubMed ID: 7434452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Use of DNA polymorphism in forensic paternity evaluation].
    Henke L; Paas H; Hoffmann K; Henke J
    Z Rechtsmed; 1990; 103(4):235-48. PubMed ID: 1969686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The probability of exclusion or likelihood of guilt of an accused: paternity.
    Selvin S; Grunbaum BW; Myhre BA
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1983 Jan; 23(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 6833988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Genetic methods for the exclusion and attribution of paternity: experience with 30 cases].
    Cifuentes L; Cruz-Coke R; Valenzuela CY; Armanet L; Lyng C; Islas E
    Rev Med Chil; 1988 Aug; 116(8):736-42. PubMed ID: 3255125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A critical analysis of paternity determination using HLA and five erythrocyte antigen systems.
    Heise ER; Keever C; McMahan MR
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 1983 Mar; 4(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 6837535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Praxis of the blood group opinion of parentage: systems with low exclusions potency; evidence of serological exclusion; biostatistical problems. Comments to a paper of H. Ritter in FamRZ 1973, 121 (author's transl)].
    Hummel K
    Z Rechtsmed; 1975 Sep; 76(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 814739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laboratory evidence of unsuspected parental consanguinity among cases of disputed paternity.
    Houtz TD; Wenk RE; Brooks MA; Dawson RB
    Forensic Sci Int; 1982; 20(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 6958638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Paternity probabilities of biologic fathers and unexcluded, falsely accused men using blood group markers.
    Wenk R; Houtz T; Brooks M
    Transfusion; 1988; 28(4):316-8. PubMed ID: 3164531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utility of HLA and six erythrocyte antigen systems in excluding paternity among 500 disputed cases.
    Houtz TD; Brooks MA; Wenk RE; Dawson RB
    Forensic Sci Int; 1981; 17(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 6786965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some fallacies in the computation of paternity probabilities.
    Aickin M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Jul; 36(4):904-15. PubMed ID: 6475961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Paternity exclusion using 18 genetic systems in 2124 cases in four South African population groups.
    du Toit ED; May RM; Halliday IL; Schlaphoff T; Taljaard DG
    S Afr Med J; 1989 Feb; 75(3):103-5. PubMed ID: 2919322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paternity testing 3: exclusion probabilities.
    Brown CM; Seber GA
    Am J Med Genet; 1987 Jan; 26(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 3812556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mathematical aspects of the paternity index I = X/Y, especially in relation to the chance of non-exclusion of non-fathers.
    Nijenhuis LE
    Z Rechtsmed; 1982; 89(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 6957085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combination of DNA-based and conventional methods to detect human leukocyte antigen polymorphism and its use for paternity testing.
    Kereszturya L; Rajczya K; Lászikb A; Gyódia E; Pénzes M; Falus A; Petrányia GG
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2002 Mar; 23(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 11953497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A note on positive identification of paternity by using genetic markers.
    Majumder PP; Nei M
    Hum Hered; 1983; 33(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 6573297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Problems and dilemmas in the testing of genetic characteristics of the blood for the purpose of determining disputed paternity (forensic hemogenetics)].
    Gligorović VN; Susaković N
    Bilt Hematol Transfuz; 1984; 12(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 6525166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.