These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6930563)

  • 1. Refusing treatment for incompetent patients; why Quinlan and Saikewicz cases agree on roles of guardians, physicians, judges, and ethics committees.
    Annas GJ
    N Y State J Med; 1980 Apr; 80(5):816-21. PubMed ID: 6930563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience.
    Thomson CJ
    Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical ethics after Quinlan: guidelines and the ethics of dying.
    Hudson RP
    J Kans Med Soc; 1982 Jul; 83(7):371-5, 340. PubMed ID: 7119537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Termination of medical treatment: a judicial perspective.
    Ackerman JW; Pope MC
    J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 6981677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medical paternalism or legal imperialism: not the only alternatives for handling Saikewicz-type cases.
    Buchanan A
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 507063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Food and water can be withheld from dying patients: the very different situations of Claire Conroy and Karen Quinlan.
    Lynn J
    Death Educ; 1984; 8(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 10310838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Withholding or withdrawing extraordinary life support. Optimizing rights and limiting liability.
    Gilfix M; Raffin TA
    West J Med; 1984 Sep; 141(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 6506679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Refusing medical treatment: incompetent adults.
    Barnes G
    Dimens Health Serv; 1983 Apr; 60(4):26-7, 29-30. PubMed ID: 6852401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 2008-2009 National Health Law Moot Court Competition: problem.
    Pope T
    J Leg Med; 2009; 30(4):443-66. PubMed ID: 19953402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The lessons of Quinlan.
    Drane JF
    Health Prog; 1986; 67(6):19-23. PubMed ID: 10277355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Saikewicz precedent: what's good for an incompetent patient?
    Ramsey P
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Dec; 8(6):36-42. PubMed ID: 152738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ironies and tensions in feeding the dying.
    Capron AM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Oct; 14(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 6438020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From Quinlan to Jobes: the courts and the PVS patient.
    Armstrong PW; Colen BD
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 3350650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz.
    Carroll PR
    Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical paternalism and the rule of law: a reply to Dr. Relman.
    Baron CH
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):337-65. PubMed ID: 507055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can healthcare providers obtain judicial intervention against surrogates who demand "medically inappropriate" life support for incompetent patients?
    Cantor NL
    Crit Care Med; 1996 May; 24(5):883-7. PubMed ID: 8706470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Who "pulls the plug:" the practical effect of the Saikewicz decision.
    Dunn LJ
    Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(4):6-8. PubMed ID: 10240214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The permanently unconscious patient, non-feeding and euthanasia.
    Cantor NL
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):381-437. PubMed ID: 2517381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminal ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part I.
    Suber DG; Tabor WJ
    JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(18):2250-1. PubMed ID: 7131676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.