190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6930563)
1. Refusing treatment for incompetent patients; why Quinlan and Saikewicz cases agree on roles of guardians, physicians, judges, and ethics committees.
Annas GJ
N Y State J Med; 1980 Apr; 80(5):816-21. PubMed ID: 6930563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience.
Thomson CJ
Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical ethics after Quinlan: guidelines and the ethics of dying.
Hudson RP
J Kans Med Soc; 1982 Jul; 83(7):371-5, 340. PubMed ID: 7119537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Termination of medical treatment: a judicial perspective.
Ackerman JW; Pope MC
J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 6981677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical paternalism or legal imperialism: not the only alternatives for handling Saikewicz-type cases.
Buchanan A
Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 507063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Food and water can be withheld from dying patients: the very different situations of Claire Conroy and Karen Quinlan.
Lynn J
Death Educ; 1984; 8(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 10310838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Withholding or withdrawing extraordinary life support. Optimizing rights and limiting liability.
Gilfix M; Raffin TA
West J Med; 1984 Sep; 141(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 6506679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Refusing medical treatment: incompetent adults.
Barnes G
Dimens Health Serv; 1983 Apr; 60(4):26-7, 29-30. PubMed ID: 6852401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. 2008-2009 National Health Law Moot Court Competition: problem.
Pope T
J Leg Med; 2009; 30(4):443-66. PubMed ID: 19953402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The lessons of Quinlan.
Drane JF
Health Prog; 1986; 67(6):19-23. PubMed ID: 10277355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Saikewicz precedent: what's good for an incompetent patient?
Ramsey P
Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Dec; 8(6):36-42. PubMed ID: 152738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ironies and tensions in feeding the dying.
Capron AM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Oct; 14(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 6438020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From Quinlan to Jobes: the courts and the PVS patient.
Armstrong PW; Colen BD
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 3350650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Carroll PR
Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical paternalism and the rule of law: a reply to Dr. Relman.
Baron CH
Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):337-65. PubMed ID: 507055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can healthcare providers obtain judicial intervention against surrogates who demand "medically inappropriate" life support for incompetent patients?
Cantor NL
Crit Care Med; 1996 May; 24(5):883-7. PubMed ID: 8706470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Who "pulls the plug:" the practical effect of the Saikewicz decision.
Dunn LJ
Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(4):6-8. PubMed ID: 10240214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The permanently unconscious patient, non-feeding and euthanasia.
Cantor NL
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):381-437. PubMed ID: 2517381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminal ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part I.
Suber DG; Tabor WJ
JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(18):2250-1. PubMed ID: 7131676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
