These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6930563)
61. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. In the matter of the guardianship of Joseph Hamlin, an incompetent person. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 3850087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Right to refuse life-sustaining treatment. Gustaitis R Pediatrics; 1988 Feb; 81(2):317-21. PubMed ID: 3340483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. The "Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act": a critical analysis. Marzen TJ Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):441-75. PubMed ID: 3636288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. What criteria should guide decision makers for incompetent patients? Emanuel EJ Lancet; 1988 Jan; 1(8578):170-1. PubMed ID: 2892998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Death by default. Lindgren J Law Contemp Probl; 1993; 56(3):185-254. PubMed ID: 10129268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. The judicial role in life-sustaining medical treatment decisions. Hafemeister TL; Keilitz I; Banks SM Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(1):53-72. PubMed ID: 1856072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe. McFadden JP; Hentoff N Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminally ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part II. Suber DG; Tabor WJ JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(19):2431-2. PubMed ID: 7131695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Legal and ethical problems in intensive care units. Vevaina JR; Kassoff E Med Law; 1991; 10(5):445-56. PubMed ID: 1791739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath. Glantz LH; Swazey JP Forum Med; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 10289145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. When is medical treatment "futile"? Bennett AJ Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 8354625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Courts, committees, and caring. Veatch RM Am Med News; 1980 May; 23(20):suppl 1-2, 11-3. PubMed ID: 10246552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. In re L.W. Hanley RA; Avila D Issues Law Med; 1993; 8(4):541-8. PubMed ID: 8463079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Law and public policy. The case for the courts. Baron C J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Oct; 32(10):734-8. PubMed ID: 6481052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Ethical dilemmas in the health care of older people. Hickey T; Benedict CJ; Stilwell DL J Health Hum Serv Adm; 1994; 17(2):120-35. PubMed ID: 10153064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Searching for proper judicial recognition of hospital ethics committees in decisions to forego medical treatment. Murphy CA Gold Gate Law Rev; 1990; 20(2):319-44. PubMed ID: 11651055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Minor advocacy in healthcare: a proposal for a more efficient solution. Kaplan J J La State Med Soc; 1997 Oct; 149(10):374-8. PubMed ID: 9347634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Legal, moral concerns in life-support treatment decisions. Kassekert R Health Prog; 1984 Sep; 65(8):44-9, 60-2. PubMed ID: 10317515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]