These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6930607)

  • 1. A method of determining the sensitometric properties of emulsions and processing techniques used in dental radiography.
    Price C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Jul; 50(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 6930607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitometric and archival evaluation of Kodak RA films in dental automatic processing.
    Thunthy KH; Yeadon WR; Winberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 8015810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on the sensitometric properties of light-sensitive films.
    Thunthy KH; Hashimoto K; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jul; 72(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 1891230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the sensitometric properties of dental X-ray films.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Mar; 126(3):341-4. PubMed ID: 7897103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A densitometric evaluation of two radiographic duplicating films under differing conditions of exposure and processing.
    Price C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Aug; 50(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 6930620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11175270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of automated nonroller processing on the sensitometric characteristics of 3 intraoral film types.
    Geist JR; Brand JW; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jul; 96(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 12847452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on the sensitometric responses of dental radiographic films.
    Price C; McDonnell D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 1884846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed films using manual and automatic processing solutions.
    Fletcher JC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jan; 63(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 3468472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films.
    Geist JR; Brand JW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A sensitometric evaluation of a dental radiographic developer additive.
    Price C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Apr; 53(4):429-32. PubMed ID: 6952156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The accuracy of an x-ray film quality-assurance step-wedge test.
    Bloxom RM; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Oct; 62(4):449-58. PubMed ID: 3464919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Densitometric evaluation of three x-ray films with five different developing solutions.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Tamse A; Kuspet ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Feb; 57(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 6583629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality control of the automatic processor.
    Legg LM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2001 Feb; 22(2):135-8, 140-2; quiz 144. PubMed ID: 11911065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitometric characteristics of dental xeroradiography.
    Gratt BM; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Nov; 56(5):555-9. PubMed ID: 6580602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contamination of dental radiographic solutions.
    Tamburus JR; Pardini LC; Watanabe PC
    Braz Dent J; 1995; 6(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 8688649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of fine structures in roentgenograms. I. A microdensitometric method.
    Hedin M; Lundberg M; Wing K
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1974; 32(6):357-64. PubMed ID: 4533571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.