These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6930620)

  • 1. A densitometric evaluation of two radiographic duplicating films under differing conditions of exposure and processing.
    Price C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Aug; 50(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 6930620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of the quality of duplicated radiographs.
    Erales FA; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Jan; 47(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 282572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Kuspet ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 6584823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on the sensitometric properties of light-sensitive films.
    Thunthy KH; Hashimoto K; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jul; 72(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 1891230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method for the geometric and densitometric standardization of intraoral radiographs.
    Duckworth JE; Judy PF; Goodson JM; Socransky SS
    J Periodontol; 1983 Jul; 54(7):435-40. PubMed ID: 6577180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of developer depletion on image quality of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus films.
    Casanova MS; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 15314003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Densitometric properties of rapid manual processing solutions: abbreviated versus complete rapid processing.
    Geist JR; Gleason MJ
    J Endod; 1995 Apr; 21(4):180-4. PubMed ID: 7673817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed films using manual and automatic processing solutions.
    Fletcher JC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jan; 63(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 3468472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiopacity of root canal sealers.
    Beyer-Olsen EM; Orstavik D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Mar; 51(3):320-8. PubMed ID: 6938892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Densitometric evaluation of three x-ray films with five different developing solutions.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Tamse A; Kuspet ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Feb; 57(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 6583629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of an x-ray film quality-assurance step-wedge test.
    Bloxom RM; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Oct; 62(4):449-58. PubMed ID: 3464919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A sensitometric evaluation of a dental radiographic developer additive.
    Price C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Apr; 53(4):429-32. PubMed ID: 6952156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiographic densitometric evaluation of seven processing solutions.
    Manson-Hing ; Monnier PY
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1975 Mar; 39(3):493-501. PubMed ID: 1054148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method of determining the sensitometric properties of emulsions and processing techniques used in dental radiography.
    Price C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Jul; 50(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 6930607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films.
    Geist JR; Brand JW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the new RadioVisioGraphy system image quality.
    Benz C; Mouyen F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 1745524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Densitometric evaluation of four radiographic processing solutions.
    Akdeniz BG; Lomçali G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9656875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contamination of dental radiographic solutions.
    Tamburus JR; Pardini LC; Watanabe PC
    Braz Dent J; 1995; 6(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 8688649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Densitometric evaluation of intra-oral radiographic film-processing solution combinations.
    Swart TJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1989 Jul; 44(7):281-3. PubMed ID: 2637510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.