These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6930909)

  • 41. Ethical issues in forensic psychiatry: from an attorney's perspective.
    Weiner BA
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 6478068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effectiveness of opposing expert witnesses for educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence.
    Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Aug; 32(4):363-74. PubMed ID: 17940854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis.
    Kovera MB; Gresham AW; Borgida E; Gray E; Regan PC
    J Appl Psychol; 1997 Feb; 82(1):178-91. PubMed ID: 9119796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Consultation of the medical expert in dispensation of safety detention (paragraphs 80 a, 246 a Criminal Code)].
    Kaatsch HJ
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1984; 42():5-8. PubMed ID: 6477451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The ethical-legal frame and forensic expert's responsibility.
    Ciornea T; Scripcaru G; Alexandru E; Ianovici N
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 1979; 83(4):569-71. PubMed ID: 550244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
    Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The impact of negative forensic evidence on mock jurors' perceptions of a trial of drug-facilitated sexual assault.
    Jenkins G; Schuller RA
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Aug; 31(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 17211690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases.
    Krauss DA; Lieberman JD; Olson J
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):801-22. PubMed ID: 15568199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Crime Scene Familiarity: Does it Influence Mock Jurors' Decisions?
    Pica E; Pozzulo J
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2017; 24(5):745-759. PubMed ID: 31983986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. What Evidence Matters to Jurors? The Prevalence and Importance of Different Homicide Trial Evidence to Mock Jurors.
    Schweitzer K; Nuñez N
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(3):437-451. PubMed ID: 31984031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Practical ethical problems of the forensic psychiatrist in dealing with attorneys.
    Sadoff RL
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 6478067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Through a scanner darkly: functional neuroimaging as evidence of a criminal defendant's past mental states.
    Brown T; Murphy E
    Stanford Law Rev; 2010 Apr; 62(4):1119-208. PubMed ID: 20429137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Insanity in the courtroom--whose?
    Lewin KK
    J Leg Med (N Y); 1974; 2(4):29-31. PubMed ID: 4546432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Ordered questions bias eyewitnesses and jurors.
    Michael RB; Garry M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):601-8. PubMed ID: 26335413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The role of the expert witness: an update.
    Auxier JA; Prichard HM
    Health Phys; 2001 Sep; 81(3):269-71. PubMed ID: 11513460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Sane and insane automatism in Australia: some dilemmas, developments and suggested reforms.
    Harding RW
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1981; 4(1-2):73-87. PubMed ID: 7327820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Expert testimony pertaining to battered woman syndrome: its impact on jurors' decisions.
    Schuller RA; Rzepa S
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Dec; 26(6):655-73. PubMed ID: 12508700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Process-related and criminalistic problems of forensic medicine experts in criminal offenses].
    Geerds F
    Arch Kriminol; 1987; 179(1-2):1-12. PubMed ID: 3566418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The problem of evasive testimony: the expert "waffle".
    Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 17389354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.