These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6931147)

  • 1. A comparison of two methods for evaluating primary class II cavity preparations.
    Goepferd SJ; Kerber PE
    J Dent Educ; 1980 Sep; 44(9):537-42. PubMed ID: 6931147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra- and inter-examiner variability in evaluating preclinical pediatric dentistry operative procedures.
    Sharaf AA; AbdelAziz AM; El Meligy OA
    J Dent Educ; 2007 Apr; 71(4):540-4. PubMed ID: 17468316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of criteria and checklists on reliability in preclinical evaluation.
    Vann WF; Machen JB; Hounshell PB
    J Dent Educ; 1983 Oct; 47(10):671-5. PubMed ID: 6225789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Judging the quality of judgments. A study on the reliability of 2 judgment methods for Class II cavity preparations].
    Straetmans GJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1986; 93(7-8):287-90. PubMed ID: 3462517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Class III cavity preparation in primary anterior teeth: in vitro retention comparison of conventional and modified forms.
    Piyapinyo S; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 9643182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial of beveled cavity preparations in primary molars: an 18-Month follow up.
    Oliveira CA; Dias PF; Dos Santos MP; Maia LC
    J Dent; 2008 Sep; 36(9):754-8. PubMed ID: 18579283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in primary teeth.
    Rossi RR; Aranha AC; Eduardo Cde P; Ferreira LS; Navarro RS; Zezell DM
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 18647510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chamfered margin effects on occlusal microleakage of primary molar Class I composite resin restorations in vitro.
    Lee BB; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9643183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Objective evaluation of quality in cavity preparations.
    Schiff AJ; Salvendy G; Root CM; Ferguson GW; Cunningham PR
    J Dent Educ; 1975 Feb; 39(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 1054369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Class II cavity preparation in primary molars, a survey of the literature.
    Blinder T
    J N J State Dent Soc; 1968 Jan; 39(5):196-206 passim. PubMed ID: 5236717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of cavity form on the durability of glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth: a three-year clinical evaluation.
    Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW; Stenberg R
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1995; 62(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 7560366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Student self-evaluation in a pediatric-operative technique course.
    Abrams RG; Kelley ML
    J Dent Educ; 1974 Jul; 28(7):385-91. PubMed ID: 4276464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials.
    Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 9796497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to evaluate intraexaminer reliability using an interexaminer reliability study design.
    Haas M
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Jan; 18(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 7706953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Replacement of resin-based composite: evaluation of cavity design, cavity depth, and shade matching.
    Gordan VV; Mondragon E; Shen C
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Apr; 33(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 11989376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Class II cavity preparation for primary molar teeth.
    Ireland RL
    Bull Acad Gen Dent; 1965 Dec; ():42-4. PubMed ID: 5216858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Primary teeth caries removal using the Carisolv chemomechanical method: a clinical trial.
    Kavvadia K; Karagianni V; Polychronopoulou A; Papagiannouli L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 15080354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.