These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6931781)

  • 1. [Stress resistance of the bone in the Tübingen immediate implants].
    Lukas D; Ney T; Schulte W
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Feb; 35(2):330-3. PubMed ID: 6931781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation on the movement of endosseous titanium implants under continuous orthodontic forces: an experimental study in the dog.
    Hsieh YD; Su CM; Yang YH; Fu E; Chen HL; Kung S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jun; 19(6):618-23. PubMed ID: 18422988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo force measurements on maxillary implants supporting a fixed prosthesis or an overdenture: a pilot study.
    Mericske-Stern R; Venetz E; Fahrländer F; Bürgin W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):535-47. PubMed ID: 11105009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants.
    Holmes DC; Loftus JT
    J Oral Implantol; 1997; 23(3):104-11. PubMed ID: 9477847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Control of jaw closing forces: a comparison between natural tooth and osseointegrated implant.
    Leung T; Lai VF
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2000 Sep; 8(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 11307564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
    Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants.
    Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five-year results of implants with an oxidized surface placed predominantly in soft quality bone and subjected to immediate occlusal loading.
    Glauser R; Zembic A; Ruhstaller P; Windisch S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S59-68. PubMed ID: 17618935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early and immediately restored and loaded dental implants for single-tooth and partial-arch applications.
    Ganeles J; Wismeijer D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19 Suppl():92-102. PubMed ID: 15635949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Concept and testing of the Tübingen immediate implant].
    Schulte W; Kleineikenscheidt H; Schareyka R; Heimke G
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1978 May; 33(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 348451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanics of oral implants: a review of the literature.
    Duyck J; Naert IE; Van Oosterwyck H; Van der Sloten J; De Cooman M; Lievens S; Puers B
    Technol Health Care; 1997 Oct; 5(4):253-73. PubMed ID: 9429268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peri-implant bone reactions at delayed and immediately loaded implants: an experimental study.
    Kim SH; Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Jeong SM; Xuan F; Lee SH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 17764984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study.
    Schincaglia GP; Marzola R; Giovanni GF; Chiara CS; Scotti R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):474-80. PubMed ID: 18700371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of bruxism on treatment planning for dental implants.
    Misch CE
    Dent Today; 2002 Sep; 21(9):76-81. PubMed ID: 12271847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consideration of biomechanical stress in treatment with dental implants.
    Misch CE
    Dent Today; 2006 May; 25(5):80, 82, 84-5; quiz 85. PubMed ID: 16729498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-year prospective clinical comparison of immediate replacement vs. immediate restoration of single tooth in the esthetic zone.
    Palattella P; Torsello F; Cordaro L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1148-53. PubMed ID: 18983318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The incomprehensible success of the implant stabilised overdenture in the edentulous mandible: a literature review on transfer of chewing forces to bone surrounding implants.
    Chao YL; Meijer HJ; Van Oort RP; Versteegh PA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Dec; 3(6):255-61. PubMed ID: 8603169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.