These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Size and direction of distortion in geometric-optical illusions: conciliation between the Müller-Lyer and Titchener configurations. Nemati F Perception; 2009; 38(11):1585-600. PubMed ID: 20120258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of gap size between shaft and fins and of angle of fins on the Müller--Lyer illusion. Pressey AW; Di Lollo V; Tait RW Perception; 1977; 6(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 917731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of changes in fin-length on apparent shaft-length and depth in the Müller-Lyer illusion. Jaeger T Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Aug; 41(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 1178436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assimilation theory, attention, and asymmetry in Müller-Lyer illusions: quantitative predictions. Pressey AW Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Oct; 119(2):509-29. PubMed ID: 25349892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic presentation boosts the Ebbinghaus illusion but reduces the Müller-Lyer and orientation contrast illusions. Takao S; Watanabe K; Cavanagh P J Vis; 2021 Jun; 21(6):4. PubMed ID: 34110368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An explanation for the Müller-Lyer illusion. Davies TN; Spencer J Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Aug; 45(1):219-24. PubMed ID: 905080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Superadditivity of the Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions depends on the method of comparison used. Foster RM; Franz VH Perception; 2014; 43(8):783-95. PubMed ID: 25549508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selective looking and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the effect of changes in the focus of attention on the Müller-Lyer illusion. Goryo K; Robinson JO; Wilson JA Perception; 1984; 13(6):647-54. PubMed ID: 6543943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of the Müller-Lyer illusion using signal detection theory. Lown BA Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Aug; 67(1):101-2. PubMed ID: 3211658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The many illusions of the Müller-Lyer: comparisons of the wings-in and wings-out illusions and manipulations of standard and dot forms. Greist-Bousquet S; Schiffman HR Perception; 1981; 10(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 7279543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Age, ability and positioning variables influencing pupils' judgments of the size of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Simon A; Ward LO Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):1339-43. PubMed ID: 4416979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of the ability to form mental images in Müller-Lyer optical illusions. Pérez-Fabello MJ; Campos A Perception; 2023 Aug; 52(8):576-589. PubMed ID: 37384424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attentive fields are related to focal and contextual features: a study of Müller-Lyer distortions. Pressey AW; Pressey CA Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):423-36. PubMed ID: 1594432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of the angle components in the wings-in and wings-out forms of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Predebon J Perception; 1996; 25(7):773-81. PubMed ID: 8923548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Illusion decrement and transfer of illusion decrement in Müller-Lyer figures. Predebon J; Stevens K; Petocz A Perception; 1993; 22(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 8378130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The creation and reversal of the Müller-Lyer illusion through attentional manipulation. Coren S; Porac C Perception; 1983; 12(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 6646952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]