These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

43 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6932576)

  • 1. [Statistical enquiry on the behavior of the gonial angle during the years of growth].
    Coplangelo G; Luzi V
    Mondo Ortod; 1980; 5(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 6932576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Correlation between the behavior of the gonial angle and the usual growth direction].
    Colangelo G; Luzi V
    Mondo Ortod; 1979; 4(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 288984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Gonial angle and growth].
    Bondi M; Colangelo G
    Mondo Ortod; 1980; 5(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 6932571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of mandibular growth in Japanese children age 4 to 9 years.
    Oueis H; Ono Y; Takagi Y
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):264-8. PubMed ID: 12064503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A longitudinal study of Korean children's growth pattern according to Gonial angle using cephalometric radiography].
    Kim JC
    Taehan Chikkwa Uisa Hyophoe Chi; 1988 May; 26(5):423-39. PubMed ID: 3269381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gonial angle growth patterns according to age and gender.
    Larrazabal-Moron C; Sanchis-Gimeno JA
    Ann Anat; 2018 Jan; 215():93-96. PubMed ID: 28954210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation of gonial angle size with cortical thickness, height of the mandibular residual body, and duration of edentulism.
    Xie QF; Ainamo A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 15153856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Craniofacial morphology in orthodontically treated patients of class III malocclusion with stable and unstable treatment outcomes.
    Tahmina K; Tanaka E; Tanne K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 10842111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusions in transitional dentition.
    Kapoor S; Kapoor DN; Jaiswal JN
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Dec; 19(4):127-33. PubMed ID: 12396087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Predicting of growth tendency with cephalometry. Cephalometric research comparing orthodontic treatment cases with four premolar extraction].
    Szabó GT; Herényi G; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2007 Feb; 100(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 17444131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Arcial growth of the mandible. Long range prediction (Ricketts)].
    Gazagne de di Carlo E; Sosa G
    Rev Fac Odontol Univ Nac (Cordoba); 1987; 15(1-2):21-38. PubMed ID: 3274256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transverse growth of the maxilla and mandible in untreated girls with low, average, and high MP-SN angles: a longitudinal study.
    Wagner DM; Chung CH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):716-23; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment.
    Kim KR; Muhl ZF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 11343025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early treatment of vertical skeletal dysplasia: the hyperdivergent phenotype.
    Sankey WL; Buschang PH; English J; Owen AH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 10982934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postsurgical growth changes in the mandible of adolescents with vertical maxillary excess growth pattern.
    Mojdehi M; Buschang PH; English JD; Wolford LM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Feb; 119(2):106-16. PubMed ID: 11174555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overbite: cephalometric evaluation of the effects of orthodontic treatment.
    Marques LS; Ramos-Jorge ML; Araujo MT; Bolognese AM
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 19146013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of the method of structural growth prediction.
    Ari-Viro A; Wisth PJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1983 Aug; 5(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 6578042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A cephalometric analysis of six Twin Block patients. A study of mandibular (body and ramus) growth and development.
    Stangl DP
    Funct Orthod; 1997; 14(2):4-6, 8-14, 17-9 passim. PubMed ID: 9610277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dentoalveolar changes related to mandibular forward growth in untreated Class II persons.
    You ZH; Fishman LS; Rosenblum RE; Subtelny JD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):598-607; quiz 676. PubMed ID: 11742304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.