These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. The use of short-and medium-term tests for carcinogens and data on genetic effects in carcinogenic hazard evaluation. Consensus report. IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):1-18. PubMed ID: 10353381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The predictive value of animal data in human cancer risk assessment. Meijers JM; Swaen GM; Bloemen LJ Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Apr; 25(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 9185886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The assessment of low-dose carcinogenicity. Armitage P Biometrics; 1982 Mar; 38 Suppl():119-39. PubMed ID: 7046818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A case study of statistics in the regulatory process: the FD&C Red No. 40 experiments. Lagakos S; Mosteller F J Natl Cancer Inst; 1981 Jan; 66(1):197-212. PubMed ID: 6935460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An alternative approach to the analysis of animal carcinogenicity studies. Stallard N; Whitehead A Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Jun; 23(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 8812967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Statistical analysis of animal cancer chemoprevention experiments. Freedman LS; Midthune DN; Brown CC; Steele V; Kelloff GJ Biometrics; 1993 Mar; 49(1):259-68. PubMed ID: 8513108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Use of data from short-term tests in the evaluation of the carcinogenicity of environmental chemicals to humans. Yamasaki H; Wilbourn JD; Haroun L Prog Clin Biol Res; 1982; 109():169-80. PubMed ID: 7167540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The implant test. Six tests for carcinogenicity. Longstaff E Br J Cancer; 1978 Jun; 37(6):954-9. PubMed ID: 678434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. IARC monograph programme on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum; 1978 Oct; 18():15-35. PubMed ID: 282232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of carcinogenic and in vivo genotoxic potency estimates. Sanner T; Dybing E Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2005 Feb; 96(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 15679476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Efficiency of age-adjusted tests in animal carcinogenicity experiments. Ryan LM Biometrics; 1985 Jun; 41(2):525-31. PubMed ID: 4027327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Apropos of the article: "Cost of studies on the carcinogenic effects of chemical compounds in animal experiments"]. Kosoĭ GKh Vopr Onkol; 1988; 34(2):240-1. PubMed ID: 3348016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Carcinogenicity studies in experimental animals. II. Interpretation of the results and significance for man]. Feron VJ; de Vrijer F; van der Heijden CA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1986 Jun; 130(23):1051-4. PubMed ID: 3724898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Cancer researchers develop short-term bioassay for assessing carcinogenic potential of chemicals. Welsh J Can Med Assoc J; 1983 Aug; 129(4):327-8. PubMed ID: 6871798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]