These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6935320)

  • 21. A comparative study of skeletal and dental stability between rigid and wire fixation for mandibular advancement.
    Keeling SD; Dolce C; Van Sickels JE; Bays RA; Clark GM; Rugh JD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):638-49. PubMed ID: 10842106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cephalometric analysis of postsurgical skeletal changes following mandibular advancement surgery.
    Hardy AS; Piecuch JF
    Quintessence Int; 1985 Jan; 16(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 3856287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Skeletal jaw relationships: a quantitative assessment using elliptical Fourier functions.
    Lowe BF; Phillips C; Lestrel PE; Fields HW
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):299-308; discussion 309-10. PubMed ID: 7978525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; D'Addona A; Miani A; Poggio CE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 8301166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Imprecision in orthodontic diagnosis: reliability of clinical measures of malocclusion.
    Keeling SD; McGorray S; Wheeler TT; King GJ
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(5):381-91. PubMed ID: 8893108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Changes in hard- and soft-tissue profiles associated with simultaneous movement of entire maxilla and mandible for mandibular prognathism].
    Seki Y
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1988 Oct; 88(10):1501-38. PubMed ID: 3270175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patterns of electromyographic activity in subjects with different skeletal facial types.
    Miralles R; Hevia R; Contreras L; Carvajal R; Bull R; Manns A
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 1763838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Class II malocclusion: mandibular retrusion or maxillary protrusion?
    Rosenblum RE
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 7726463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stability after surgical-orthodontic corrective of skeletal Class III malocclusion. 3. Combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
    Proffit WR; Phillips C; Turvey TA
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(4):211-25. PubMed ID: 1820406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The normal range of horizontal jaw position in an adult female sample. A comparison with Class II data.
    Tourne LP; Michiels LY
    Int J Orthod; 1990; 28(3-4):8-12. PubMed ID: 2262300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 1. On Angle Class I malocclusion (author's transl)].
    Iwasawa T; Yamazaki T; Kawasaki H; Ohkawa S; Mimori M
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Jun; 39(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 6935308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Floating norms for the ANB angle as guidance for clinical considerations.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Nov; 90(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 3465233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion: a comparison of three skeletal maturation groups.
    Cha KS
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 12607852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Craniofacial morphology in orthodontically treated patients of class III malocclusion with stable and unstable treatment outcomes.
    Tahmina K; Tanaka E; Tanne K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 10842111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Maxillary and mandibular dentoalveolar heights of French-Canadians 10 to 15 years of age.
    Buschang PH; Carrillo R; Liu SS; Demirjian A
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 18193960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
    Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of dental arch and alveolar widths of patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion and subjects with Class I ideal occlusion.
    Sayin MO; Turkkahraman H
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 15264647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 11298314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.