These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6935338)

  • 21. [Scanning electron microscopy analysis of various preparation methods for Class II cavity walls].
    De Marchi M; Passi P; Cordioli GP
    Dent Cadmos; 1984 Sep; 52(9):91, 93, 95-100. PubMed ID: 6396108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative study of cutting efficiency of hand, gyromatic and path-finder root canal instruments. A scanning electron microscope study.
    Shah N
    Indian J Dent Res; 1993; 4(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8180277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is the presence of the smear layer a limiting factor for root dentin permeability in primary teeth?
    Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Sinhoreti MA; Puppin-Rontani RM
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2007; 74(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 18482511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of tubule orientation in the cavity wall on the seal of dental filling materials: an in vitro study.
    Wu MK; de Gee AJ; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 1998 Sep; 31(5):326-32. PubMed ID: 9823134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of root canal preparation using different automated devices and hand instrumentation.
    Hülsmann M; Stryga F
    J Endod; 1993 Mar; 19(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 8509753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparative SEM study of 3 technics for root canal preparation using 8 types of instruments].
    Caporale PF; Ciucchi B; Holz J
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed (1984); 1986 Jan; 96(1):261-76. PubMed ID: 3456632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficacy of the NaviTip FX irrigation needle in removing post instrumentation canal smear layer and debris in curved root canals.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Serrano SA; Palo RM; Iglesias EF
    J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1270-3. PubMed ID: 19720229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of methods and effects of endodontic irrigants in the preparation of root canals.
    Koskinen KP
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1981; 77 Suppl 1-3():1-74. PubMed ID: 7335646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A SEM study of in vivo accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator.
    Pagavino G; Pace R; Baccetti T
    J Endod; 1998 Jun; 24(6):438-41. PubMed ID: 9693591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Six percent citric acid better than hydrogen peroxide in removing smear layer: an in vitro pilot study.
    Salama FS; Abdelmegid FY
    Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(6):424-6. PubMed ID: 7854949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Efficacy of NaOCl/H2O2 irrigation and GaAlAs laser in decontamination of root canals in vitro.
    Kreisler M; Kohnen W; Beck M; Al Haj H; Christoffers AB; Götz H; Duschner H; Jansen B; D'Hoedt B
    Lasers Surg Med; 2003; 32(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 12605425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of a solvent-softened gutta-percha obturation technique in curved canals.
    Moyer PW; Osetek EM; Ashkenaz P; Gilbert JL
    J Endod; 1995 Sep; 21(9):459-63. PubMed ID: 8537789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Problems posed by the preparation and impression of the root canal cavity for retained castings].
    Maestroni F
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1982 Sep; 11(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 6755611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Preparation and treatment of cavities].
    Mjör IA
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1977 Jan; 87(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 265059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Wet and dry deep cavity preparations compared by a novel odontoblast culture technique.
    Holt KG; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP
    J Endod; 2001 Feb; 27(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 11491631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A novel noninstrumented technique for cleansing the root canal system.
    Lussi A; Nussbächer U; Grosrey J
    J Endod; 1993 Nov; 19(11):549-53. PubMed ID: 8151242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cleanliness of dentinal tubules following gutta-percha removal with and without solvents: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Horvath SD; Altenburger MJ; Naumann M; Wolkewitz M; Schirrmeister JF
    Int Endod J; 2009 Nov; 42(11):1032-8. PubMed ID: 19825038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.