These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Directional forces and favourable changes of A point in Class II, division 1 cases. Spyropoulos MN Eur J Orthod; 1980; 2(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 6935060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Relationship between crown-root angulation (collum angle) of maxillary central incisors in Class II, division 2 malocclusion and lower lip line. Srinivasan B; Kailasam V; Chitharanjan A; Ramalingam A Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e66-74. PubMed ID: 23646340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Soft-tissue changes associated with maxillary incisor retraction. Rains MD; Nanda R Am J Orthod; 1982 Jun; 81(6):481-8. PubMed ID: 6960733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Vertical growth of the lips: a serial cephalometric study. Vig PS; Cohen AM Am J Orthod; 1979 Apr; 75(4):405-15. PubMed ID: 285616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Lip curve changes in males with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment. Lin PT; Woods MG Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):71-86. PubMed ID: 16429877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Lower incisor extraction in orthodontic treatment. Four clinical reports. Kokich VG; Shapiro PA Angle Orthod; 1984 Apr; 54(2):139-53. PubMed ID: 6588770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Changes in soft tissue profile during and after orthodontic treatment. Finnöy JP; Wisth PJ; Böe OE Eur J Orthod; 1987 Feb; 9(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 3470187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Treatment of Class II malocclusions with removable appliances. 1. Case assessment. Rock WP Br Dent J; 1990 Feb; 168(4):163-6. PubMed ID: 2310637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Associations between upper lip activity and incisor position. Kilic N Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 20575201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of lower lip changes following incisor displacement in 92 orthodontically-treated adults. Mirabella D; Quartarone L; Lombardo L; Guarneri A; Guarneri MP; Siciliani G Int Orthod; 2012 Sep; 10(3):289-310. PubMed ID: 22921347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The importance of the nasolabial angle in the diagnosis and treatment of malocclusions. Elias AC Int J Orthod; 1980 Jun; 18(2):7-12. PubMed ID: 6930368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance. Pancherz H; Hägg U Am J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 88(4):273-87. PubMed ID: 3863486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the fixed appliance. Remmer KR; Mamandras AH; Hunter WS; Way DC Am J Orthod; 1985 Nov; 88(5):363-72. PubMed ID: 3864370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Light-wire treatment of a Class II, division 1 subdivision malocclusion. An American Board of Orthodontics case report. Kelly MF Am J Orthod; 1986 Mar; 89(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 3456713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The maxillary sagittal appliance: a clinical study. Owen AH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Apr; 91(4):271-85. PubMed ID: 3551578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]