These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6936764)

  • 1. Radiographic identification of simulated carious lesions in relation to fillings with Adaptic Radiopaque.
    Sewerin I
    Scand J Dent Res; 1980 Oct; 88(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 6936764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of lesion size, restorative material, and film speed on the detection of recurrent caries.
    Matteson SR; Phillips C; Kantor ML; Leinedecker T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Aug; 68(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 2674831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of spatulation time upon the radiographic homogeneity of Adaptic Radiopaque fillings.
    Sewerin I
    Scand J Dent Res; 1981 Feb; 89(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 6940235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiopacity of restorations and detection of secondary caries.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB; Erickson RL; Keck SC; Glasspoole EA
    Dent Mater; 1991 Apr; 7(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 1936639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hørsted-Bindslev P
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography.
    Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K; Ye F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic caries diagnosis. A study of caries progression and observer performance.
    Gröndahl HG
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1979; (3):1-32. PubMed ID: 293056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiographic detection of recurrent carious lesions associated with composite restorations.
    Goshima T; Goshima Y
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Aug; 70(2):236-9. PubMed ID: 2290656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and radiographic assessment of approximal carious lesions.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1986 Feb; 44(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 3456691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Martinez TS; Matteson SR; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1397457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of radiopacity of dental composites on the diagnosis of secondary caries: the correlation between objective and subjective analyses.
    Cruz AD; Esteves RG; Poiate IA; Portero PP; Almeida SM
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 23713807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prevalence and incidence of caries lesions in relation to placement and replacement of fillings: a longitudinal observational radiographic study of an adult Danish population.
    Kirkevang LL; Vaeth M; Wenzel A
    Caries Res; 2009; 43(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 19439950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiographic diagnosis of caries and marginal defects in connection with radiopaque composite fillings.
    Tveit AB; Espelid I
    Dent Mater; 1986 Aug; 2(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 3462061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of materials radiopacity in the radiographic diagnosis of secondary caries: evaluation in film and two digital systems.
    Pedrosa RF; Brasileiro IV; dos Anjos Pontual ML; dos Anjos Pontual A; da Silveira MM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Sep; 40(6):344-50. PubMed ID: 21831973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiopacity of glass ionomer materials.
    Skartveit L; Halse A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Jan; 23(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 8850153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Caries development in a young population managed by a restrictive attitude to radiography and operative intervention: II. A study at the surface level.
    Lith A; Lindstrand C; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):232-9. PubMed ID: 12087440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vertical angulation of the X-ray beam and radiographic diagnosis of secondary caries.
    Tveit AB; Espelid I; Erickson RL; Glasspoole EA
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1991 Dec; 19(6):333-5. PubMed ID: 1837258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnosis of secondary caries and crevices adjacent to amalgam.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Int Dent J; 1991 Dec; 41(6):359-64. PubMed ID: 1800386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.