These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6938567)

  • 1. Influence of contact stress, sliding velocity, and surface roughness on the sliding wear of a composite restorative.
    Bailey WF; Rice SL; Albert RL; Temin SC
    J Dent Res; 1981 May; 60(5):914-8. PubMed ID: 6938567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wear behavior of a composite restorative and various styli in sliding contact.
    Rice SL; Bailey WF; Roto M; Wayne SF
    J Dent Res; 1984 Jun; 63(6):932-5. PubMed ID: 6234340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surface failure of commercial and experimental restorative resins.
    Powers JM; Roberts JC; Craig RG
    J Dent Res; 1976; 55(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 1063753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 19410068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of enamel stylus stiffness on the sliding-wear behavior of a composite restorative.
    Rice SL; Bailey WF; Pacelli PF; Blanck WR
    J Dent Res; 1982 Mar; 61(3):493-6. PubMed ID: 6460797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative in vitro sliding-wear study of conventional, microfilled, and light-cured composite restoratives.
    Rice SL; Bailey WF; Wayne SF; Burns JA
    J Dent Res; 1984 Sep; 63(9):1173-5. PubMed ID: 6589283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attrition at the enamel-restoration interface.
    Chowdhury MU; Kobayashi K; Uchiyama Y
    Asian J Aesthet Dent; 1995; 3():23-30. PubMed ID: 9063106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative sliding-wear behavior of a dental amalgam and a composite restorative as a function of contact stress.
    Bailey WF; Rice SL
    J Dent Res; 1981 Mar; 60(3):731-2. PubMed ID: 6937507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Esthetic restorative materials and opposing enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Marques MM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 18505225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness.
    Mörmann WH; Stawarczyk B; Ender A; Sener B; Attin T; Mehl A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Apr; 20():113-25. PubMed ID: 23455168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro wear response of composite resin, amalgam, and enamel.
    Powell JM; Phillips RW; Norman RD
    J Dent Res; 1975; 54(6):1183-95. PubMed ID: 1059657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wear of dental tissues and materials.
    Craig RG; Powers JM
    Int Dent J; 1976 Jun; 26(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 786897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved single- and multi-contact life-time testing of dental restorative materials using key characteristics of the human masticatory system and a force/position-controlled robotic dental wear simulator.
    Raabe D; Harrison A; Ireland A; Alemzadeh K; Sandy J; Dogramadzi S; Melhuish C; Burgess S
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2012 Mar; 7(1):016002. PubMed ID: 22155971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo evaluation of the surface of posterior resin composite restorations: a pilot study.
    Pesun IJ; Olson AK; Hodges JS; Anderson GC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 11005910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [An in vitro model for the simulation of approximal wear].
    Schmidlin PR; Pasqualetti T; Imfeld T; Besek M
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2003; 113(4):427-38. PubMed ID: 12768888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of a paste-free prophylaxis polishing cup and various prophylaxis polishing pastes on tooth enamel and restorative materials.
    Covey DA; Barnes C; Watanabe H; Johnson WW
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):466-73; quiz 474-5. PubMed ID: 22313918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tribological characteristics of enamel-dental material contacts investigated in vitro.
    Wojda S; Szoka B; Sajewicz E
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2015; 17(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 25952294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wear of composite resin veneering materials and enamel in a chewing simulator.
    Mehl C; Scheibner S; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Nov; 23(11):1382-9. PubMed ID: 17210173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of shearing action of food on contact stress and subsequent wear of stress-bearing composites.
    Pallav P; de Gee AJ; Werner A; Davidson CL
    J Dent Res; 1993 Jan; 72(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 8418108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.