These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials. Hoelscher DC; Neme AM; Pink FE; Hughes PJ Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9610331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An investigation about the effect of start polishing time on surface roughness of composite restoratives. Hassan FM Egypt Dent J; 1980 Jan; 26(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 6948680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing. St Germain HA; Meiers JC Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. How do composite resins stand the test of time? Mopper KW Dent Today; 2004 May; 23(5):74-6, 78-9. PubMed ID: 15164478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part II. Comparisons between composite and alloy restorations. Full CA; Hollander WR ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8432948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Study of surface finishing of composite restorative materials. II. Finishing with quasite disk (author's transl)]. Goto G; Yonezu T; Hosoya Y; Machida Y Shikwa Gakuho; 1979 Mar; 79(3):581-5. PubMed ID: 298062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of air polishing on contemporary esthetic restorative materials. Carr MP; Mitchell JC; Seghi RR; Vermilyea SG Gen Dent; 2002; 50(3):238-41. PubMed ID: 12116510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing protocols. Yazici AR; Müftü A; Kugel G J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):9-17. PubMed ID: 17618325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of dental finishing instruments on the surface roughness of composite resins as elucidated by atomic force microscopy. Botta AC; Duarte S; Paulin Filho PI; Gheno SM Microsc Microanal; 2008 Oct; 14(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 18793482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials. Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of a clear matrix to minimize finishing of a posterior resin composite. Trushkowsky RD Am J Dent; 1997 Apr; 10(2):111-2. PubMed ID: 9545900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Interproximal finishing of esthetic restorations. Strassler HE MSDA J; 1997; 40(3):105-7. PubMed ID: 10635144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A direct approach to restore anterior teeth. Denehy GE Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):55D-59D. PubMed ID: 11763919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Update on anterior restorative materials: an interview with Dr. Dan Nathanson. Interview by Phillip Bonner. Nathanson D Dent Today; 2000 Apr; 19(4):80, 82-4. PubMed ID: 19750732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Surface roughness of three resin restorative materials after finishing and polishing. Cadenaro M; Biasotto M; Contardo L; Chiesa R; Di Lenarda R; Dorigo E Minerva Stomatol; 2006 Apr; 55(4):179-87. PubMed ID: 16618992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Current adhesive dentistry as an alternative to amalgam: case history. Adams T Dent Today; 2001 Mar; 20(3):82-5. PubMed ID: 12524873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]