These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6939089)
1. Non linear attenuation by hearing protectors. Johansson B Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):200-3. PubMed ID: 6939089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in efficiency of earplugs and earmuffs measured as hearing impairments from two workshops. Ivarsson A; Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Nilsson P Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):194-9. PubMed ID: 6939088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Effectiveness of ear protective devices]. Taniewski M; Zaborski L; Szczepański C; Nitka J Med Pr; 1978; 29(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 723611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hearing protector performance--an update. Michael PL; Bienvenue GR Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Aug; 41(8):542-6. PubMed ID: 7405821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effectiveness of hearing protectors in practice. Alberti PW; Riko K; Abel SM; Kristensen R J Otolaryngol; 1979 Aug; 8(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 513182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of personal hearing protection in practice. Smoorenburg GF; Mimpen TM Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 16():13-22. PubMed ID: 6962507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Relative ear protector performance in high vs low sound levels. Thunder TD; Lankford JE Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Dec; 40(12):1023-9. PubMed ID: 539542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of a new ear-plug: Takeda's ear-plug (untone). Takeda H; Morizono T Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):223-9. PubMed ID: 6939092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Attenuation efficiency of hearing protectors for workers exposed to noise]. Murakami M; Hirota Y; Ohwada H; Kanemitsu K Sangyo Igaku; 1984 Mar; 26(2):178-9. PubMed ID: 6503014 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods of measuring and rating hearing protector performance. Lotito F Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Oct; 37(10):590-5. PubMed ID: 983949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation of sound level conversion as a means of rating ear protector performance. Waugh R Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Apr; 37(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 1274842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of protector-noise interaction on the accuracy of the NRR estimate of hearing protector attenuation. Cluff GL Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Apr; 47(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 3706147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pure tone audiometry with and without specific ear protectors. Rodrigues de Faria CA; Suzuki FA Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2008; 74(3):417-22. PubMed ID: 18661017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of ear protection against impulse noise. Brinkman H Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 16():23-39. PubMed ID: 6962509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The difference in protection efficiency between earplugs and earmuffs. An investigation performed at a workplace. Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 7466283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sound attenuation of TDH-39 earphones in a diffuse field of narrow-band noise. Arlinger SD J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jan; 79(1):189-91. PubMed ID: 3944342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of the attenuation characteristics of nonlinear hearing protective devices using the auditory brain stem response. Wilde GL; Humes LE J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):730-3. PubMed ID: 3584681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]