These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6939097)

  • 21. [Audiometric evaluation in extended high frequencies of individuals exposed to occupational noise].
    Porto MA; Gahyva DL; Lauris JR; Lopes AC
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 15609579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. High-frequency audiometry. Normative studies and preliminary experiences.
    Laukli E; Mair IW
    Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 4059853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Course of the audiometric threshold in relation to the age in chronic acoustic trauma].
    Albera R
    Med Lav; 1997; 88(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 9312663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission spectra and high-resolution audiometry in noise-induced hearing loss.
    Avan P; Bonfils P
    Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):68-75. PubMed ID: 16112827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. High frequency Bekesy audiometry: II. Threshold test procedure, reliability and validity.
    Gauz MT; Ahroon WA; Roberts SD
    J Aud Res; 1981 Jan; 21(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 7349867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An evaluation of high-frequency audiometry suitable for routine clinical use.
    Rendell RJ; Miller JJ
    Br J Audiol; 1983 May; 17(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 6626785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Audiometric instrumentation: equipment choices, techniques.
    Morrill JC
    Occup Health Saf; 1984; 53(10):78-84. PubMed ID: 6549600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Application of extended high frequency audiometry in the early diagnosis of noise--induced hearing loss].
    Wang Y; Yang B; Li Y; Hou L; Hu Y; Han Y
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Feb; 35(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 12768684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The relationship of continuous (C) and interrupted (I) tones at threshold and most comfortable loudness (MCL) in hearing-impaired ears.
    Dancer J; Ventry IM
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 6539262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The automatic tone decay test as part of dynamic measurement of threshold.
    Lehnhardt E; Battmer RD
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1980; 226(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 7458749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Clinical trial of BOBCAT: 1st report on the reliability and validity of computerized pure-tone audiometry].
    Picard M; Ilecki HJ; Baxter JD
    Audiology; 1988; 27(4):234-46. PubMed ID: 3056359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The use of tonal audiometry in the study of hearing loss in workers exposed to industrial noise].
    Constantinescu V; Negulescu M
    Viata Med Rev Inf Prof Stiint Cadrelor Medii Sanit; 1980 Aug; 28(8):187-9. PubMed ID: 6777981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Comparison of different charts for determining the percentage of hearing loss].
    Tymnik G; Kessler L; Koch R
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1983 Apr; 62(4):157-9. PubMed ID: 6865607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measurements of click-evoked otoacoustic emission in industrial workers with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Kowalska S; Sułkowski W
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 1997; 10(4):441-59. PubMed ID: 9575669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Relationship between auditory disability and auditory threshold in acute acoustic trauma: pilot study].
    Albera R; Beatrice F; Grasso M; Romano C; Bosia S; Cavallo R; Vergnano P; Luccioli L; Argentero P
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1994; 14(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 7976328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Technical characteristics of the Békésy audiometer in diagnosis].
    Keller F
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1972 Oct; 51(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 5081039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the hearing threshold measured by manual pure-tone and by self-recording (Békésy) audiometry.
    Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
    Audiology; 1979; 18(5):414-29. PubMed ID: 496724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing pure-tone audiometry and auditory steady state response for the measurement of hearing loss.
    Ahn JH; Lee HS; Kim YJ; Yoon TH; Chung JW
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Jun; 136(6):966-71. PubMed ID: 17547989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Amplitude variation in calibrated audiometer systems in clinical simulations.
    Barlow C; Davison L; Ashmore M; Weinstein R
    Noise Health; 2014; 16(72):299-305. PubMed ID: 25209040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computerized pure tone audiometry.
    Almqvist B; Aursnes J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (Suppl 8):193-6. PubMed ID: 299103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.