These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6939334)

  • 1. Relationships between changes in skeletal and integumental points A and B following orthodontic treatment.
    LaMastra SJ
    Am J Orthod; 1981 Apr; 79(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 6939334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Soft tissue changes of patients with skeletal class II malocclusion after orthodontic and surgical treatments].
    Chen K; Zheng Y; Wang X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Feb; 20(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 12593199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the changes in facial profile after orthodontic treatment, with and without extractions.
    Bravo LA; Canut JA; Pascual A; Bravo B
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Feb; 24(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 9088600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II.
    Holdaway RA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Apr; 85(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 6585146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Profile changes in Class II, division 1 malocclusions: a comparison of the effects of Edgewise and Fränkel appliance therapy.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Aug; 11(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 2792214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting changes in soft tissue profile after various treatment modalities for skeletal Class II malocclusion: A cross-sectional study.
    Khan AR; Fida M; Sukhia RH
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 31257136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Hard and soft tissue profile changes and their relation to the maxillary protrusion of adult females treated with the Begg technic].
    Machida M
    Shigaku; 1984 Apr; 71(6):1036-62. PubMed ID: 6591080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between hard and soft tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions using Edgewise and Fränkel appliance techniques.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):154-65. PubMed ID: 2351200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relation of the SNA angle to the NSAr angle in excellent occlusion and in malocclusion.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Mar; 81(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 6960712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Changes in the soft and hard tissues and their interrelations after retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth].
    Saraç M
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1985; 12(2):309-19. PubMed ID: 3870113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cephalometric evaluation of hard and soft tissue changes during class III traction.
    Lin JX; Huang JF; Zeng XL
    Eur J Orthod; 1985 Aug; 7(3):201-4. PubMed ID: 3862594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skeletal and soft tissue response to activator treatment.
    Forsberg CM; Odenrick L
    Eur J Orthod; 1981; 3(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 6945995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Maetevorakul S; Viteporn S
    Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():13. PubMed ID: 27135067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors.
    Talass MF; Talass L; Baker RC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 May; 91(5):385-94. PubMed ID: 3472457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cephalometric evaluation of hard- and soft-tissue changes during the third stage of Begg treatment.
    Cangialosi TJ; Meistrell ME
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Feb; 81(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 6960701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; D'Addona A; Miani A; Poggio CE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 8301166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Soft tissue thickness of face profile conditioning by dento-skeletal anomalies].
    Tanić T; Blažej Z; Mitić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2011; 139(7-8):439-45. PubMed ID: 21980651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the fixed appliance.
    Remmer KR; Mamandras AH; Hunter WS; Way DC
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Nov; 88(5):363-72. PubMed ID: 3864370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of a lingual arch appliance with anterior bite plane in deep overbite correction.
    Forsberg CM; Hellsing E
    Eur J Orthod; 1984 May; 6(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 6587967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.