These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6939388)

  • 1. Air sampling in hospitals.
    Gröschel DH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1980; 353():230-40. PubMed ID: 6939388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bacterial air counts obtained with a centrifugal (RCS) sampler and a slit sampler--the influence of aerosols.
    Casewell MW; Fermie PG; Thomas C; Simmons NA
    J Hosp Infect; 1984 Mar; 5(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 6202752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The biotest RCS air samplers in unidirectional flow.
    Ljungqvist B; Reinmüller B
    J Pharm Sci Technol; 1994; 48(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 8004418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Survey of Four Fluid Milk Processing Plants for Airborne Contamination Using Various Sampling Methods.
    Ren TJ; Frank JF
    J Food Prot; 1992 Jan; 55(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 31071805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of Airborne Contamination in Two Commercial Ice Cream Plants.
    Ren TJ; Frank JF
    J Food Prot; 1992 Jan; 55(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 31071796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative performance of two air samplers for monitoring airborne fungal propagules.
    Távora LG; Gambale W; Heins-Vaccari EM; Arriagada GL; Lacaz CS; Santos CR; Levin AS
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2003 May; 36(5):613-6. PubMed ID: 12715080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Airborne Microflora Collected by the Andersen Sieve Sampler and RCS Sampler in a Dairy Processing Plant.
    Kang YJ; Frank JF
    J Food Prot; 1989 Dec; 52(12):877-880. PubMed ID: 31003361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of portable air samplers for monitoring airborne culturable bacteria.
    Mehta SK; Bell-Robinson DM; Groves TO; Stetzenbach LD; Pierson DL
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(6):850-4. PubMed ID: 11192219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Air Samplers for Recovery of Artificially Generated Aerosols of Pure Cultures in a Controlled Environment.
    Kang YJ; Frank JF
    J Food Prot; 1989 Aug; 52(8):560-563. PubMed ID: 31003329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enumeration of viable fungi in occupational environments: a comparison of samplers and media.
    Smid T; Schokkin E; Boleij JS; Heederik D
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 May; 50(5):235-9. PubMed ID: 2729098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of the Reuter centrifugal air sampler for the estimation of bacterial air counts in different hospital locations.
    Casewell MW; Desai N; Lease EJ
    J Hosp Infect; 1986 May; 7(3):250-60. PubMed ID: 2873171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Air Samplers for Recovery of Biological Aerosols in Dairy Processing Plants.
    Kang YJ; Frank JF
    J Food Prot; 1989 Sep; 52(9):655-659. PubMed ID: 31003282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers.
    Li K
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Nov; 409(24):5493-8. PubMed ID: 21968260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A monitor for airborne bacteria.
    ANDERSEN AA; ANDERSEN MR
    Appl Microbiol; 1962 May; 10(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 13861149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the commercial bacterial air samplers by the new bacterial aerosol generator.
    Furuhashi M; Miyamae T
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1981 Mar; 28(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 7011587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A field comparison of four samplers for enumerating fungal aerosols I. Sampling characteristics.
    Lee KS; Bartlett KH; Brauer M; Stephens GM; Black WA; Teschke K
    Indoor Air; 2004 Oct; 14(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 15330796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
    An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative performance of impactor air samplers for quantification of fungal contamination.
    Nesa D; Lortholary J; Bouakline A; Bordes M; Chandenier J; Derouin F; Gangneux JP
    J Hosp Infect; 2001 Feb; 47(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 11170780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel multi-slit large-volume air sampler.
    Buchanan LM; Decker HM; Frisque DE; Phillips CR; Dahlgren CM
    Appl Microbiol; 1968 Aug; 16(8):1120-3. PubMed ID: 4970892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of three impactor samplers for measuring airborne bacteria and fungi concentrations.
    Méheust D; Gangneux JP; Cann PL
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(8):455-9. PubMed ID: 23799861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.