These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6940222)

  • 1. Sensitivity of different human cell line in the biologic evaluation of dental resin-based restorative materials.
    Hensten-Pettersen A; Helgeland K
    Scand J Dent Res; 1981 Feb; 89(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 6940222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cytotoxicity of resin monomers on human gingival fibroblasts and HaCaT keratinocytes.
    Moharamzadeh K; Van Noort R; Brook IM; Scutt AM
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 16426672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Indirect cytotoxicity of dental materials: a study with Transwell inserts and the neutral red uptake assay.
    Babich H; Sinensky MC
    Altern Lab Anim; 2001; 29(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11178571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of biologic effects of dental materials using four different cell culture techniques.
    Hensten-Pettersen A; Helgeland K
    Scand J Dent Res; 1977 May; 85(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 266755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of three resin monomers on the cellular glutathione concentration of cultured human gingival fibroblasts.
    Volk J; Engelmann J; Leyhausen G; Geurtsen W
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jun; 22(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 16198408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of restorative materials on marginal gingiva.
    Willershausen B; Köttgen C; Ernst CP
    Eur J Med Res; 2001 Oct; 6(10):433-9. PubMed ID: 11698230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Glass ionomer and composite resin cements: effects on oral cells.
    Caughman WF; Caughman GB; Dominy WT; Schuster GS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 May; 63(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 2338664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the effects of two kinds of glass-ionomer cement on human gingival fibroblast attachment, proliferation and morphology in vitro.
    Yan F; Xiao Y; Li H; Haase H; Bartold PM
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2000 Jan; 2(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 12666981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphological analysis and interleukin release in human gingival fibroblasts seeded on different denture base acrylic resins.
    Trubiani O; Toniato E; Di Iorio D; Diomede F; Merciaro I; D' Arcangelo C; Caputi S
    Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol; 2012; 25(3):637-43. PubMed ID: 23058014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modification of the agar overlay assay: assessment of the influence of acrylics used in orthodontics on proliferation and differentiation of primary and transformed fibroblasts.
    Schuster G; Tomakidi P; Kohl A; Komposch G
    J Orofac Orthop; 1996 Dec; 57(6):344-53. PubMed ID: 8986053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reactions of the gingiva to dental materials.
    Klötzer WT
    Rev Belge Med Dent; 1976; 31(3):253-76. PubMed ID: 824692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Applications of inflammation-derived gingival stem cells for testing the biocompatibility of dental restorative biomaterials.
    Soancă A; Lupse M; Moldovan M; Pall E; Cenariu M; Roman A; Tudoran O; Surlin P; Șorițău O
    Ann Anat; 2018 Jul; 218():28-39. PubMed ID: 29604386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Resins for Stereolithographic 3D-Printed Surgical Guides: The Response of L929 Cells and Human Gingival Fibroblasts.
    Kurzmann C; Janjić K; Shokoohi-Tabrizi H; Edelmayer M; Pensch M; Moritz A; Agis H
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():4057612. PubMed ID: 29201905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of human gingival fibroblast interaction with dental implant abutment materials.
    Rutkunas V; Bukelskiene V; Sabaliauskas V; Balciunas E; Malinauskas M; Baltriukiene D
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2015 Apr; 26(4):169. PubMed ID: 25804303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confocal time lapse imaging as an efficient method for the cytocompatibility evaluation of dental composites.
    Attik GN; Gritsch K; Colon P; Grosgogeat B
    J Vis Exp; 2014 Nov; (93):e51949. PubMed ID: 25406737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental restorative biomaterials induce glutathione depletion in cultured human gingival fibroblast: protective effect of N-acetyl cysteine.
    Stanislawski L; Soheili-Majd E; Perianin A; Goldberg M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Sep; 51(3):469-74. PubMed ID: 10880090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A methodologic study of the effect of dental materials on growth and adhesion of animal cells in vitro.
    Leirskar J; Helgeland K
    Scand J Dent Res; 1972; 80(2):120-33. PubMed ID: 4114676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cytotoxic effects of denture base materials on a permanent human oral epithelial cell line and on primary human oral fibroblasts in vitro.
    Huang FM; Tai KW; Hu CC; Chang YC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 12066639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cytotoxicity and induction of DNA double-strand breaks by components leached from dental composites in primary human gingival fibroblasts.
    Shehata M; Durner J; Eldenez A; Van Landuyt K; Styllou P; Rothmund L; Hickel R; Scherthan H; Geurtsen W; Kaina B; Carell T; Reichl FX
    Dent Mater; 2013 Sep; 29(9):971-9. PubMed ID: 23915819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cytotoxic effects to mouse and human gingival fibroblasts of a nanohybrid ormocer versus dimethacrylate-based composites.
    Schubert A; Ziegler C; Bernhard A; Bürgers R; Miosge N
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jan; 23(1):133-139. PubMed ID: 29603022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.