BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6940573)

  • 1. Retained Grafenberg ring for 39 years discovered during abdominal hysterectomy.
    Farghaly SA; Mathie JG
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Nov; 20(4):248-50. PubMed ID: 6940573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognizing malignancy in intrauterine contraceptive device users.
    Castadot MJ; Robinowitz M; Chervenak FA; Sedlis A; Boria MC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Apr; 136(7):966-7. PubMed ID: 7361845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The missing forgotten intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Gruber A; Rabinerson D; Kaplan B; Pardo J; Neri A
    Contraception; 1996 Aug; 54(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 8842589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retained Graefenberg ring intrauterine device mimicking fractured Lippes loop in-utero.
    Goh Tai Heng ; Kuan BB
    Med J Malaysia; 1985 Mar; 40(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 3831735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Secondary cervical perforation by the Copper-T intrauterine device.
    Ovadia J; Reichman J; Goldman JA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1979 Dec; 9(6):403-4. PubMed ID: 400870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A misplaced intrauterine device: a case report.
    Nguma M; Ntabona BC; Rahma-Tozin R; Lusanga N
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1984 Oct; 22(5):421-4. PubMed ID: 6151931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complications associated with the unsuspected presence of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Porges RF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Jun; 116(4):579-80. PubMed ID: 4709493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ovarian pregnancy in association with an intrauterine device.
    de Vries K; Shapiro I; Degani S; Levitan Z; Mitrani A; Sharf M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1983 Feb; 21(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 6133796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A partial uterine perforation (type 2) by a copper-T IUD: sonographic diagnosis and management.
    Abramovici H; Sorokin Y; Bornstein J; Auslander R
    J Ultrasound Med; 1985 Jul; 4(7):381-3. PubMed ID: 3892041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some observations on intrauterine contraceptive device (Lippes loop).
    Menon MK
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 1970 Jun; 20(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 12275251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Management of the missing intrauterine contraceptive device: report of a case.
    Gorsline JC; Osborne NG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Sep; 153(2):228-9. PubMed ID: 3898848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recovery of the intrauterine contraceptive device from the sigmoid colon. Three case reports.
    Browning JJ; Bigrigg MA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 May; 95(5):530-2. PubMed ID: 3042019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting intrauterine contraceptive device performance. I. Endometrial cavity length.
    Hasson HM; Berger GS; Edelman DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Dec; 126(8):973-81. PubMed ID: 998687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uterine histopathologic changes after Cu-Fix intrauterine device insertion.
    Reinprayoon D; Taneepanichskul S; Niruthisard S; Suwajanakon S
    Contraception; 1999 Jan; 59(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 10342087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hysterographic study of some side effects of the copper T 200 device.
    Hefnawi FI; Hamed AF; Askalani H; Younis N; El Sheikha Z; Sherif H
    Popul Sci; 1982; (3):73-91. PubMed ID: 12266220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes of plasminogen activator in human uterine tissue induced by intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Shaw ST; Macaulay LK; Sun NC; Tanaka MS; Roche PC
    Contraception; 1983 Feb; 27(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 6682747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transdermal estrogen with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device for climacteric complaints: clinical and endometrial responses.
    Raudaskoski TH; Lahti EI; Kauppila AJ; Apaja-Sarkkinen MA; Laatikainen TJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 172(1 Pt 1):114-9. PubMed ID: 7847516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Massive hemoperitoneum due to IUD.
    Goldman JA; Feldberg D; Dicker D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1983 Jan; 14(4):239-40. PubMed ID: 6832447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intravesical migration of intrauterine device.
    Dietrick DD; Issa MM; Kabalin JN; Bassett JB
    J Urol; 1992 Jan; 147(1):132-4. PubMed ID: 1729505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postpartum IUDS: keys for success.
    O'Hanley K; Huber DH
    Contraception; 1992 Apr; 45(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 1516367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.