These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6940924)

  • 1. [Relationship between mandibular form and skeletal facial type of Japanese adults (author's transl)].
    Sugawara J
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1981 Mar; 40(1):32-56. PubMed ID: 6940924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of the results of 2 discriminant analyses (face and mandible) in 4 groups of adult gorillas].
    Biecq-Sellier M; Baillet R; Fenart R
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 3():1083-7. PubMed ID: 1842247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of the change in mandibular position on the soft tissue facial pattern in three dimensions.
    Loh KW
    Singapore Dent J; 1983 May; 8(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 6581537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mandibular rotation and lower face height indicators.
    Ghafari J; Brin I; Kelley MB
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 2923319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A consideration on the change of lower anterior facial height in a case of mandibular protrusion (author's transl)].
    Noguchi K
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1981 Sep; 40(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 6947033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults.
    Forster CM; Sunga E; Chung CH
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 18263889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft tissue response to Le Port I maxillary impaction surgery.
    Sakima T; Sachdeva R
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1987; 2(4):221-31. PubMed ID: 3483180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Relationship between molar dentoalveolar and craniofacial heights.
    Martina R; Farella M; Tagliaferri R; Michelotti A; Quaremba G; van Eijden TM
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):974-9. PubMed ID: 16448240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vertical proportions of face: a cephalometric study.
    Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS; Sundrum KR
    Int J Orthod; 1991; 29(3-4):6-8. PubMed ID: 1802874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Relationship between two measurements of the facial profile and the ANB angle (author's transl)].
    Muñiz B
    Ortodoncia; 1979 Nov; 43(86):105-11. PubMed ID: 298804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association between facial height development and mandibular growth rotation in low and high MP-SN angle faces: a longitudinal study.
    Karlsen AT
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 9107374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preadenoid space size and its relationship to the vertical facial type.
    Gomez CE; Gomez LC; Chacon JA
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 16548308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Saving the face and the TMJ--Part 2.
    Bowbeer GR
    Funct Orthod; 1986; 3(2):9-13, 15, 17 passim. PubMed ID: 3458656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electromyographic activity of masseter and temporal muscles with different facial types.
    Vianna-Lara MS; Caria PH; Tosello Dde O; Lara F; Amorim MM
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):515-20. PubMed ID: 19413373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longitudinal changes in facial type in cases with vertical and horizontal mandibular growth directions.
    Lundström A; Woodside DG
    Eur J Orthod; 1983 Nov; 5(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 6581048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The anthropomorphic proportions of the face: an evaluation of the response to orthodontic surgical treatment of Angle class III].
    Savastano C; Craca R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1992 Sep; 41(9):373-83. PubMed ID: 1491654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between thoracic, lordotic, and pelvic inclination and craniofacial morphology in adults.
    Lippold C; Danesh G; Schilgen M; Drerup B; Hackenberg L
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):779-85. PubMed ID: 17029510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Measurement of maxillary and mandibular area on roentgenocephalograms. Comparisons between skeletal Class I, II and III (author's transl)].
    Sakai T; Ito Y; Takeshita S; Yamada K
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Sep; 39(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 6935320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in soft tissue profile after surgical correction of skeletal class III malocclusion.
    Kajikawa Y
    J Oral Surg; 1979 Mar; 37(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 283217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.