These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6941225)

  • 1. Effect of prepared cavities on the strength of teeth.
    Larson TD; Douglas WH; Geistfeld RE
    Oper Dent; 1981; 6(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 6941225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative investigation of dynamic loading of prepared and intact human premolars.
    Catović AM
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jun; 23(6):435-8. PubMed ID: 1502324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations.
    Mondelli J; Steagall L; Ishikiriama A; de Lima Navarro MF; Soares FB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Apr; 43(4):419-22. PubMed ID: 6928479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of maxillary premolars with approximal slot cavities.
    el-Mowafy OM
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8152985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture strength of weakened human premolars restored with amalgam with and without cusp coverage.
    Mondelli RF; Barbosa WF; Mondelli J; Franco EB; Carvalho RM
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 10388373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Mechanical resistance of endodontically treated upper first premolar crowns].
    Marcoli PA; Pasini S; Visconti L; Bellagamba F
    G Ital Endod; 1991; 5(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 1782437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal ridge strength of teeth with tunnel preparations.
    Strand GV; Tveit AB; Gjerdet NR; Eide GE
    Int Dent J; 1995 Apr; 45(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 7558348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture resistance in conservative Class II cavity preparation: box vs tunnel.
    Khairy MA
    Egypt Dent J; 1994 Jul; 40(3):751-6. PubMed ID: 9588153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of designs of Class 2 preparations on resistance of teeth to fracture.
    Blaser PK; Lund MR; Cochran MA; Potter RH
    Oper Dent; 1983; 8(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 6574432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracturing molars with axial forces.
    Re GJ; Norling BK
    J Dent Res; 1981 Apr; 60(4):805-8. PubMed ID: 6937516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations.
    Fonseca RB; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Correr-Sobrinho L; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 98(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 17936127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth.
    Sagsen B; Aslan B
    Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):900-4. PubMed ID: 17014529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
    Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The response of human premolars to cyclic loading.
    Catović A; Kraljević K; Jerolimov V; Celebić A; Kovacićek F; Valentić-Peruzović M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Apr; 24(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 9147307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations.
    de V Habekost L; Camacho GB; Azevedo EC; Demarco FF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 17854619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Influence of cavity preparation on mechanical resistance of teeth].
    Lopes LM; Leitão JG; Douglas WH
    Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac; 1991; 31(4):207-13. PubMed ID: 2041972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
    Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.