These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6941695)

  • 1. Some epistatic two-locus models of disease. I. Relative risks and identity-by-descent distributions in affected sib pairs.
    Hodge SE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1981 May; 33(3):381-95. PubMed ID: 6941695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Some epistatic two-locus models of disease. II. The confounding of linkage and association.
    Hodge SE; Spence MA
    Am J Hum Genet; 1981 May; 33(3):396-406. PubMed ID: 6941696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multilocus linkage tests based on affected relative pairs.
    Cordell HJ; Wedig GC; Jacobs KB; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1273-86. PubMed ID: 10729111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the role of HLA-linked and unlinked determinants of disease.
    Risch N
    Am J Hum Genet; 1987 Jan; 40(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 3468804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linkage analysis in nuclear families. 1: Optimality criteria for affected sib-pair tests.
    Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
    Hum Hered; 1994; 44(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 8163290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The affected sib method. V. Testing the assumptions.
    Louis EJ; Payami H; Thomson G
    Ann Hum Genet; 1987 Jan; 51(1):75-92. PubMed ID: 3314668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epistasis in quantitative trait locus linkage analysis: interaction or main effect?
    Purcell S; Sham PC
    Behav Genet; 2004 Mar; 34(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 14755179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-locus disease models with two marker loci: the power of affected-sib-pair tests.
    Knapp M; Seuchter SA; Baur MP
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Nov; 55(5):1030-41. PubMed ID: 7977340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
    McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. HLA-associated diseases: a new method for performing linkage analysis with other markers than HLA.
    Clerget-Darpoux F; Babron MC; Bonaïti-Pellie C
    Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Sep; 36(5):1075-81. PubMed ID: 6594041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. HLA sharing in multiplex sibships.
    Suarez BK; Crouse J; Van Eerdewegh P
    Ann Hum Genet; 1983 May; 47(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 6881912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multipoint linkage analysis using sib pairs: an interval mapping approach for dichotomous outcomes.
    Olson JM
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Mar; 56(3):788-98. PubMed ID: 7887435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses.
    Thomson G; Motro U
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The HLA system and the analysis of multifactorial genetic disease.
    Tomlinson IP; Bodmer WF
    Trends Genet; 1995 Dec; 11(12):493-8. PubMed ID: 8533166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating linkage and linkage disequilibrium: use of excess sharing and transmission disequilibrium methods in affected sib pairs.
    Wicks J; Wilson SR
    Ann Hum Genet; 2000 Sep; 64(Pt 5):419-32. PubMed ID: 11281280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power of the affected-sib-pair method to defect disease susceptibility loci of small effect: an application to multiple sclerosis.
    Suarez B; O'Rourke D; Van Eerdewegh P
    Am J Med Genet; 1982 Jul; 12(3):309-26. PubMed ID: 6956238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Partitioned association-linkage test: distinguishing "necessary" from "susceptibility" loci.
    Greenberg DA; Doneshka P
    Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 8797007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: multiple-locus segregation analysis incorporating linkage markers.
    Risch N
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 14971378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consanguinity and the sib-pair method: an approach using identity by descent between and within individuals.
    Génin E; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Nov; 59(5):1149-62. PubMed ID: 8900245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.