These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. The effects of reduced fertility, method of ascertainment, and a second unlinked locus on affected sib-pair marker allele sharing. Risch N Am J Med Genet; 1983 Oct; 16(2):243-59. PubMed ID: 6580817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified. Göring HH; Terwilliger JD Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1310-27. PubMed ID: 10731466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optimal ascertainment strategies to detect linkage to common disease alleles. Badner JA; Gershon ES; Goldin LR Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Sep; 63(3):880-8. PubMed ID: 9718337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robust multipoint identical-by-descent mapping for affected relative pairs. Schaid DJ; Sinnwell JP; Thibodeau SN Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Jan; 76(1):128-38. PubMed ID: 15573301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Two-disease locus model: sib pair method using information on both HLA and Gm. Dizier MH; Clerget-Darpoux F Genet Epidemiol; 1986; 3(5):343-56. PubMed ID: 3781239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs. Risch N Am J Hum Genet; 1990 Feb; 46(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 2301393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Maximum likelihood estimation of genetic parameters of HLA-linked diseases using data from families of various sizes. Ewens WJ; Clarke CP Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Jul; 36(4):858-72. PubMed ID: 6475958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of stratification in the analysis of affected-sib-pair data: benefits and costs. Leal SM; Ott J Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):567-75. PubMed ID: 10677317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The affected-/discordant-sib-pair design can guarantee validity of multipoint model-free linkage analysis of incomplete pedigrees when there is marker-marker disequilibrium. Xing C; Sinha R; Xing G; Lu Q; Elston RC Am J Hum Genet; 2006 Aug; 79(2):396-401. PubMed ID: 16826532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detecting marker-disease association by testing for Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium at a marker locus. Nielsen DM; Ehm MG; Weir BS Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Nov; 63(5):1531-40. PubMed ID: 9867708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Affected-sib-pair data can be used to distinguish two-locus heterogeneity from two-locus epistasis. Cordell HJ Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Dec; 73(6):1468-71; author reply 1471-3. PubMed ID: 14655099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The relationship between the sibling recurrence-risk ratio and genotype relative risk. Rybicki BA; Elston RC Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):593-604. PubMed ID: 10677319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Adequacy of single-locus approximations for linkage analyses of oligogenic traits: extension to multigenerational pedigree structures. Vieland VJ; Greenberg DA; Hodge SE Hum Hered; 1993; 43(6):329-36. PubMed ID: 8288263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The TDT reveals linkage and linkage disequilibrium in a rare disease. McGinnis RE; Ewens WJ; Spielman RS Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):637-40. PubMed ID: 8787986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Association between a genetic trait and a marker: discrimination between epistasis and gametic disequilibrium. Clerget-Darpoux F; Lathrop GM Hum Genet; 1985; 69(2):188-9. PubMed ID: 3855838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of linkage disequilibrium measures for fine-scale mapping. Devlin B; Risch N Genomics; 1995 Sep; 29(2):311-22. PubMed ID: 8666377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]