These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6942259)
1. Medical malpractice panel. How has it worked? Flynn JT N Y State J Med; 1981 Jun; 81(7):1112-5. PubMed ID: 6942259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The medical malpractice mediation panel. Young RA N Y State J Med; 1989 Oct; 89(10):554-6. PubMed ID: 2608214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical review organizations: a model state immunity statute. Kopit WG; Shapiro LE; Eaton KB Group Pract; 1980 Apr; 29(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 10273186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical malpractice: thinking about the federal role. Blumstein JF J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1989; 12(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 10296434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A 20-year experience with malpractice screening panels. Kridelbaugh WW; Palmisano DJ Bull Am Coll Surg; 1997 May; 82(5):21-3. PubMed ID: 10167808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Healthcare law firms find malpractice verdict 'chilling'. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1991 Jan; 21(2):39. PubMed ID: 10108473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The defensive effect of medical practice policies in malpractice litigation. Hall MA Law Contemp Probl; 1991; 54(1-2):Spring 119-45. PubMed ID: 10114970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The medical board investigation process. Athy D Ohio Med; 1989 May; 85(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 2726142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The professional responsibility for the quality of health care. A discussion of methods. Panel discussion. Rosenberg C; Donabedian A; Greenberg SM; Guck JK; Sillman FH; Knutson R; Reichman S; Morehead MA Bull N Y Acad Med; 1976 Jan; 52(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 1060499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Illinois Supreme Court upholds constitutionality of state peer review act. Peterson RN Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jun; 7(13):3-4. PubMed ID: 10273522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. PRO release of medical information. Implications for Missouri physicians and hospitals. Akhter MN Mo Med; 1985 Nov; 82(11):695-7. PubMed ID: 4069102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Uncle Sam's written invitation to sue you. Stevens C Med Econ; 1987 Mar; 64(6):32-7. PubMed ID: 10281011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reform of the state professional disciplinary process: five modest proposals. Moskowitz DP N Y State Dent J; 1986; 52(6):32-4. PubMed ID: 3459976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Negligence law and the required standard of care. Edelman J Hosp Med Staff; 1975 Jun; 4(6):28-9. PubMed ID: 10273077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bivens actions not allowed against peer review organizations. Margolis RE Healthspan; 1994 Feb; 11(2):17-8. PubMed ID: 10132989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Physicians and medical malpractice. Kahn AI N Y State J Med; 1986 Nov; 86(11):604. PubMed ID: 3467229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hospital accountability in health care delivery. Belmont CE Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1983 Dec; 5(10):7-39. PubMed ID: 10273432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]