These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6942366)

  • 1. Image resolution in dental and maxillofacial radiography with the conventional and "free focus" imaging concepts.
    Jensen TW; Goldberg AJ; Randall GJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Jun; 51(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 6942366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The free focus concept in dental and maxillofacial radiography. The present status of the miniaturized dental x-ray machines.
    Jensen TW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Mar; 47(3):282-93. PubMed ID: 283359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-yield radiography of the maxillofacial complex using the free focus and conventional imaging concepts. The resolution performance of nonscreen and screen-film combinations.
    Jensen TW; Goldberg AJ; Randall GJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Sep; 56(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 6579466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Free-focus radiography using conventional films--radiation exposures in a simulated clinical study.
    Jensen TW; Randall GJ; Goldberg AJ
    Med Phys; 1980; 7(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 7393160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Free focus radiography with miniaturized dental x-ray machines: a comparison of "midline" and "lateral" techniques.
    Jensen TW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Aug; 56(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 6578485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cone-beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region--an update.
    Kau CH; Bozic M; English J; Lee R; Bussa H; Ellis RK
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Dec; 5(4):366-80. PubMed ID: 19777550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinical opinion survey of new fine detail panoramic radiographs.
    Jensen TW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Sep; 66(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 3174074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation of potential applications of intensifying screens in intraoral radiography.
    Stephens RG; Kogon SL; Reid JA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Nov; 54(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 6960313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digitally Scanned Radiographs versus Conventional Films for Determining Clarity of Periapical Lesions and Quality of Root Canal Treatment.
    Almanei K; Alsulaimani R; Alfadda S; Albabtain S; Alsulaimani R
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2017; 2017():2427060. PubMed ID: 29270461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics].
    Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New radiographic programs for transverse conventional tomograms in the dentomaxillofacial region.
    Kaeppler G
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Aug; 30(8):541-9. PubMed ID: 10635267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study for spatial resolution and subjective image characteristics of a multi-slice CT and a cone-beam CT for dental use.
    Watanabe H; Honda E; Tetsumura A; Kurabayashi T
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 19819091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): system configuration and physical properties.
    Araki K; Maki K; Seki K; Sakamaki K; Harata Y; Sakaino R; Okano T; Seo K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 15140823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator.
    Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; van Aken J
    J Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 62(11):674-83. PubMed ID: 1753320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoral computed radiography using the Fuji computed radiography imaging plate. Correlation between image quality and reading condition.
    Kashima I; Sakurai T; Matsuki T; Nakamura K; Aoki H; Ishii M; Kanagawa Y
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Aug; 78(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 7936596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imaging of Dentoalveolar and Jaw Trauma.
    Alimohammadi R
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2018 Jan; 56(1):105-124. PubMed ID: 29157541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct digital radiography in the dental office.
    Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
    Int Dent J; 1995 Feb; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7607741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.