These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. [The x-ray cephalometric characteristics of the facial skeleton in mesial occlusion]. ZHulev EN Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1991; 70(3):49-52. PubMed ID: 1926211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Normal radiographic anatomy and common anomalies seen in cephalometric films. Kantor ML; Norton LA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 May; 91(5):414-26. PubMed ID: 3554978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Variations in the occlusal plane and of the maxillo-mandibular coordinates in relation to various skull types]. Pezzoli M; Garino G Ann Stomatol (Roma); 1968 Oct; 17(10):809-18. PubMed ID: 5268935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Roentgencraniometric analysis of skulls of mammoth hunters from Dolní Vestonice. Vlcek E; Smahel Z Acta Chir Plast; 2002; 44(4):136-41. PubMed ID: 12661929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Morphological interrelationship between the dento-facial complex and teeth. Preliminary report. 3. Classification of occlusion]. Takahama Y; Suzuki Y Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1969 Jun; 28(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 5258841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Multiple correlations between craniofacial characteristics: an x-ray study. Smahel Z; Skvaŕilová B Am J Phys Anthropol; 1988 Oct; 77(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 3207171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Structure of the base of the skull in different types of bite based on teleroentgenographic data]. Shcherbakov AS; Zhulev EN; Trezubov VN Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1983; 62(3):71-3. PubMed ID: 6577722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [A study on lateral head plates of normal occlusion and malocclusions (Angle's class I, class II and class 3)]. Iwasawa T; Nakakuki M; Matsumoto Y Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1969 Jun; 28(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 5258825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Lateral x-ray analysis of the facial skeleton]. LINDEGARD B Odontol Revy; 1954; 5(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 13176860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Radiographic panoramic demonstration of the middle face using central focus]. von Domarus H Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1972 Feb; 116(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 4336188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Forty-five Northern Irish families: a cephalometric radiographic study. Brown WA Am J Phys Anthropol; 1973 Jul; 39(1):57-85. PubMed ID: 4736576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Cephalometric changes in acromegaly]. Morăraşu C; Burlui V; Zbranca E Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 1997; 101(1-2):120-4. PubMed ID: 10756739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [A study on the relation between the T.M.J. and the cranio-facial form of normal occlusion using roentgenographic cephalometry]. Takimoto M Shigaku; 1982 Oct; 70(3):492-510. PubMed ID: 6964854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparisons of craniofacial features in monozygous and dizygous triplets. Menezes DM; Foster TD Dent Pract Dent Rec; 1970 Nov; 21(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 5275869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A cephalometric appraisal of Chinese adults having normal occlusion and excellent facial types. Lin WL J Osaka Dent Univ; 1985 Apr; 19(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 3869214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Variability of the craniofacial skeleton. II. Comparison between two age groups. Vinkka H; Koski K Am J Orthod; 1975 Jan; 67(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 803025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]