These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6942657)

  • 61. Craniofacial differences between Japanese and British Caucasian females with a skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Ishii N; Deguchi T; Hunt NP
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):493-9. PubMed ID: 12407945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Submentovertex cephalometric norms in Turkish adults.
    Uysal T; Malkoc S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):724-30. PubMed ID: 16360912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Cephalometric morphology of Chinese with Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Lau JW; Hägg U
    Br Dent J; 1999 Feb; 186(4 Spec No):188-90. PubMed ID: 10205956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Posteroanterior cephalometric analysis of White-American and Chinese adolescents: a cross-sectional study.
    Liu S; Shen L; Jiang R; Lin J; Xu T
    Cranio; 2020 Nov; 38(6):402-411. PubMed ID: 30570387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A cephalometric study of tooth position as related to facial structure in profiles of human beings: a comparison of Japanese (Oriental) and American (Caucasian) adults.
    Reitz PV; Aoki H; Yoshioka M; Uehara J; Kubota Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 1973 Feb; 29(21):157-66. PubMed ID: 4509355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms for the Lambada population in Telangana Region of Andhra Pradesh.
    Thomas M; Reddy VD; Lakshmi HV
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 23059572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Overbite depth indicator and anteroposterior dysplasia indicator cephalometric norms for African Americans.
    Obamiyi S; Wang Z; Sommers E; Rossouw PE; Michelogiannakis D
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Nov; 89(6):897-902. PubMed ID: 31306073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Adding Depth to Cephalometric Analysis: Comparing Two- and Three-Dimensional Angular Cephalometric Measurements.
    Jodeh DS; Kuykendall LV; Ford JM; Ruso S; Decker SJ; Rottgers SA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 30(5):1568-1571. PubMed ID: 31299770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Discriminatory ability of the skeletal maturation index and the cervical vertebrae maturation index in detecting peak pubertal growth in Indonesian and white subjects with receiver operating characteristics analysis.
    Soegiharto BM; Moles DR; Cunningham SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):227-37. PubMed ID: 18675204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Cephalometric norms and esthetic profile preference for the Japanese: a systematic review.
    Bronfman CN; Janson G; Pinzan A; Rocha TL
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(6):43-51. PubMed ID: 26691969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. [Mandibular values in adults with normal occlusion].
    Seren E
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 2101662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Sagittal lip positions in different skeletal malocclusions: a cephalometric analysis.
    Joshi M; Wu LP; Maharjan S; Regmi MR
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():8. PubMed ID: 26061982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Automatic Analysis of Lateral Cephalograms Based on Multiresolution Decision Tree Regression Voting.
    Wang S; Li H; Li J; Zhang Y; Zou B
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():1797502. PubMed ID: 30581546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Soft tissue facial profile of normal dental and skeletal subjects in Croatian population aged 12 to 15 years.
    Lapter Varga M; Anić Milosević S; Vusić A; Slaj M; Varga S; Perinić M; Slaj M
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Jun; 32(2):523-8. PubMed ID: 18756905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Cephalometric pattern of Jewish East European adolescents with clinically acceptable occlusion.
    Ben-Bassat Y; Dinte A; Brin I; Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Nov; 102(5):443-8. PubMed ID: 1476110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Cephalometric features of Filipinos with Angle Class I occlusion according to the Munich analysis.
    Naranjilla MA; Rudzki-Janson I
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 15747817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Yemeni men.
    Al-Gunaid T; Yamada K; Yamaki M; Saito I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):576.e7-14. PubMed ID: 18005826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: a modified approach - (Sagittal relation).
    Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Shanthasundari KK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 23059564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Cephalometric norms for the upper airway in a healthy Hong Kong Chinese population.
    Samman N; Mohammadi H; Xia J
    Hong Kong Med J; 2003 Feb; 9(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12547953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Comparison of dentoalveolar protrusion values in Moroccans and other populations.
    Lahlou K; Bahoum A; Makhoukhi MB; Aalloula el H
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 20018796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.