133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6942718)
1. A comprehensive occupational carcinogen policy as a framework for regulatory activity.
Ruttenberg R; Bingham E
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1981; 363():13-20. PubMed ID: 6942718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Deficiencies of science and policy in generic cancer regulation by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
Hoerger FD; Conder JW
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1981; 363():21-7. PubMed ID: 6942723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Carcinogenic risk management in the United States.
Selikoff IJ
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1981; 363():283-93. PubMed ID: 6942729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk assessment: too complex, too soon.
Robbins A
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1981; 363():59-61. PubMed ID: 6942735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Agencies in dispute over cancer policy.
Sun M
Science; 1982 Jul; 217(4556):233. PubMed ID: 7089559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Measures for the prevention of occupational cancer.
Weaver NK
J Occup Med; 1976 Sep; 18(9):607-10. PubMed ID: 966092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. OSHA announces proposed cancer policy..
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1977 Apr; 38(4):A24-9. PubMed ID: 868752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The emerging regulatory dilemma.
Barnard RC
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1981; 363():89-98. PubMed ID: 6942737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The carcinogen standard of the new Occupational Safety and Health Act.
Eckardt RE
Bull N Y Acad Med; 1974 May; 50(5):620-5. PubMed ID: 4522774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Why the delay in cancer-protection standards?
Rose V
Occup Health Saf; 1977; 46(3):49-50. PubMed ID: 194192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Regulators loosen up on carcinogen standards.
Dickson D
Nature; 1980 Jan; 283(5745):320-1. PubMed ID: 7352007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The renewed dialogue between science and labor.
Clayman J
Prev Med; 1972 Aug; 1(3):382-7. PubMed ID: 5085005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Occupational cancer risk management in Sweden.
Holmberg B
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1981; 363():255-60. PubMed ID: 6942727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Yearly report on carcinogens could be a potent weapon in the war on cancer.
Carter LJ
Science; 1979 Feb; 203(4380):525-8. PubMed ID: 760203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Anatomy of unreasonable risk.
Jaeschke WC
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1981; 363():49-57. PubMed ID: 6942734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Management of assessed risk for carcinogens in Canada: the interplay of social, political, and scientific factors.
Atherley GR
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1981; 363():261-7. PubMed ID: 6942728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An alternative to risk-benefit analysis in government decision-making about chemical carcinogens.
Roderick H
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1981; 363():233-45. PubMed ID: 6942725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Formaldehyde: a question of cancer policy?
Perera F; Petito C
Science; 1982 Jun; 216(4552):1285-91. PubMed ID: 7079759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Existing legislation and government regulatory agencies.
Quarles JR
Bull N Y Acad Med; 1978 Apr; 54(4):442-3. PubMed ID: 274979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Industrial views and concerns with regard to regulatory process.
Smith CW
Tex Rep Biol Med; 1978; 37():204-11. PubMed ID: 752981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
