These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6942887)

  • 1. Angular changes in cephalometric and centroid planes during foetal growth.
    Trenouth MJ
    Br J Orthod; 1981 Apr; 8(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 6942887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in the jaw relationships during human foetal cranio-facial growth.
    Trenouth MJ
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Jan; 12(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 3855657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prenatal assessment of the antero-posterior jaw relationship in human fetuses: from anatomical to ultrasound cephalometric analysis.
    Captier G; Faure JM; Bäumler M; Canovas F; Demattei C; Daures JP
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Jul; 48(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 20815708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The position of the occlusal plane in dentulous subjects with various skeletal jaw-relationships.
    Sinobad D
    J Oral Rehabil; 1988 Sep; 15(5):489-98. PubMed ID: 3244056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A longitudinal study of 5 cephalometric plane angles in female children from 7 to 12 years old].
    Peng J; Deng H; Cao C
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Jun; 20(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 12600065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional McNamara Cephalometric Analysis.
    Santos RMGD; De Martino JM; Haiter Neto F; Passeri LA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 29(4):895-899. PubMed ID: 29381618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the centroid method of occlusion for studying mandibular and maxillary growth.
    Murata S; Nakamura S; Nagahara K
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16644852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Functional and esthetic cephalometric analysis of the profile].
    Gola R; Cheynet F; Guyot L; Richard O
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2004 Dec; 105(6):329-35. PubMed ID: 15671954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new approach to cephalometric analysis of the dental base relationship.
    Johnson JS
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 272128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric investigation of craniomaxillofacial structures during the prenatal period: a cadaver study.
    Esenlik E; Sener EH; Yılmaz HH; Malas MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):217-27. PubMed ID: 24485737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Centroid analysis of twin-block appliance treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Trenouth MJ
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 16779975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Craniofacial structures' development in prenatal period: An MRI study.
    Begnoni G; Serrao G; Musto F; Pellegrini G; Triulzi FM; Dellavia C
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2018 May; 21(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 29533534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible.
    Nanda RS; Merrill RM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Apr; 105(4):328-44. PubMed ID: 8154458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation of anatomical and centroid points in the human fetal skull.
    Trenouth M
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(1):39-44; discussion 45-6. PubMed ID: 8507029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Maxillary and mandibular rotation type in normal and II (1) malocclusion adolescents with different growth patterns].
    Wu H; Zhou L; Zhou L; Li J; Wang YM
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 28(1):48-51, 56. PubMed ID: 20337075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facial pattern and anterior apical base.
    Luder HU
    Angle Orthod; 1986 Jan; 56(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 3456735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alteration in facial shape in the anencephalic human foetus.
    Trenouth MJ
    Br J Orthod; 1996 May; 23(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 8771337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shape changes during human fetal craniofacial growth.
    Trenouth MJ
    J Anat; 1984 Dec; 139 ( Pt 4)(Pt 4):639-51. PubMed ID: 6526716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reliability of 3 sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class I and Class III treatment.
    Palleck S; Foley TF; Hall-Scott J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):426-35. PubMed ID: 11298316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.