These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6945322)
1. A comparative study of radiation doses received from constant direct current and conventional self-rectified panoramic dental x-ray equipment. Forest D; Deschamps M; Normandeau L J Dent Que; 1981; 18():9-17. PubMed ID: 6945322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Radiation load of patients and professional personnel during pantomography with Cranex DC x-ray machine]. Taschner P; Rother U; Landeck E; Tetzlaff W; Edelmann BU Stomatol DDR; 1984 May; 34(5):298-302. PubMed ID: 6591583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of radiation doses received during examinations with the pantomograph, orthopantomograph, Panorex, Status-X and conventional roentgen apparatus. Altonen M; Heikkilä M; Mattila K Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1974 Apr; 70(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 4831509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Panoramic radiography with the Status X in dental practice]. Gatti PL; Rondelli C; Cardullo M Parodontol Stomatol (Nuova); 1984; 23(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 6443435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Dental panoramic radiography with intra-oral X-ray tubes. Keur JJ; Macdonald R Aust Dent J; 1986 Feb; 31(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 3459421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The cant of the occlusal plane and distortion in the panoramic radiograph. Philipp RG; Hurst RV Angle Orthod; 1978 Oct; 48(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 281889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [X-ray machines for single and panoramic X-rays]. Jung T Freie Zahnarzt; 1977 Jun; 21(6):60-8. PubMed ID: 275206 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The National Commission on Dental Practice. Equipment for panoramic radiography]. Chir Dent Fr; 1981 Sep; 51(124):42-4. PubMed ID: 6947870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Survey of dental radiographic equipment and radiation doses in Finland. Havukainen R Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(4):481-5. PubMed ID: 3408611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Development of dental radiography equipment]. Chikirdin EG Med Tekh; 1995; (2):35-7. PubMed ID: 7791567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Problems posed by the utilization of ionizing radiation in dental practice. 3. Recommendations on radioprotective materials for the dental radiologist]. Wambersie A; Lejeune A; Gillet R Rev Belge Med Dent; 1975; 30(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 1054875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The radiation burden in high resolution panoramic radiography. The fanned exposure pattern and integral absorbed dose in free focus radiography. Jensen TW Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1984; 13(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 6586592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Rare-earth filters in panoramic radiography: a means of reducing patient dose without compromising image quality. Tyndall DA; Washburn DB Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3460901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The extraoral lateral oblique radiograph: a radiation-efficient replacement for the pantomograph. Stephens RG; Reid JA J Can Dent Assoc; 1983 Jul; 49(7):483-90. PubMed ID: 6351978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]