These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6945985)

  • 1. [Movement behavior to impact stimulation of the Tübingen implant compared to natural teeth].
    Scholz F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1981 Sep; 36(9):567-70. PubMed ID: 6945985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses.
    Weinberg LA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 8468083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Posterior guidance of natural teeth in the adult. A hypothesis.
    Ross IF
    J Periodontol; 1977 Nov; 48(11):714-21. PubMed ID: 269947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection times of natural teeth and endosseous implants revealed by the method of reaction time.
    Mattes S; Ulrich R; Mühlbradt L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):399-402. PubMed ID: 9197106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The Tubingen endosseous Al1O2 implant (Frialit). Developments after 6 years].
    Schulte W
    Zahnarztl Mitt; 1981 Oct; 71(19):1114-22 contd. PubMed ID: 7032130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanoperception of natural teeth versus endosseous implants revealed by magnitude estimation.
    Mühlbradt L; Ulrich R; Möhlmann H; Schmid H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 2599584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Stress resistance of the bone in the Tübingen immediate implants].
    Lukas D; Ney T; Schulte W
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Feb; 35(2):330-3. PubMed ID: 6931781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Qualitative mechanoperception of natural teeth and endosseous implants.
    Ulrich R; Mühlbradt L; Möhlmann H; Schmid H; Hoss A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 8359873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses.
    Akpinar I; Demirel F; Parnas L; Sahin S
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9063207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Tooth movement during loading].
    Saito R
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Dec; 50(4):568-87. PubMed ID: 6585434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical interactions of an implant/tooth-supported system under different periodontal supports and number of splinted teeth with rigid and non-rigid connections.
    Lin CL; Chang SH; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    J Dent; 2006 Oct; 34(9):682-91. PubMed ID: 16439048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of the intramobile connector in implant tooth-supported fixed prostheses: an experimental stress analysis.
    Uysal H; Iplikcioğlu H; Avci M; Bilir OG; Kural O
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 8957873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical trial experience with the Tübingen implant].
    Schwarz G; Kümmerle U
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1981 Sep; 36(9):607-8. PubMed ID: 7028459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Damping properties of periodontium compared to the Tübinger Sofort implant].
    Scholz F; Holzwarth W; Lukas D; Schulte W
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Jul; 35(7):709-12. PubMed ID: 6936242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing implant placement and aesthetics: technology to the rescue!
    Kosinski T
    Dent Today; 2009 Aug; 28(8):72, 74, 76. PubMed ID: 19715070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Human bone attachment to the Tübingen implant].
    Büsing CM; d'Hoedt B
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1981 Sep; 36(9):563-6. PubMed ID: 6945984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of occlusion on implants and implant componentry--Part I.
    Le Gall MG
    Dent Implantol Update; 1996 Aug; 7(8):61-4. PubMed ID: 9525167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Prior clinical experience with the Tübingen Frialit implant type].
    Wagner W; Tetsch P; Bossler L
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1981 Sep; 36(9):585-90. PubMed ID: 6945988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant-bone interface characteristics of bioglass dental implants.
    Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Cook SD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Jan; 14(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 6987233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.