These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6946081)

  • 1. Proximoclusal composite restorations in primary molars: a two-year follow-up.
    Leifler E; Varpio M
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1981; 48(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 6946081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition.
    Varpio M
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1993; 96():1-47. PubMed ID: 8310420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars: A two-year clinical evaluation.
    Andersson-Wenckert I; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Nov; 64(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 17123909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Composite restorations for primary molars: results after four years.
    Oldenburg TR; Vann WF; Dilley DC
    Pediatr Dent; 1987 Jun; 9(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 3475683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation.
    Dutta BN; Gauba K; Tewari A; Chawla HS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Sep; 19(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 11817797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of composite resin tunnel restorations on primary molars.
    de Freitas AR; de Andrada MA; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; de Sousa CN
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jun; 25(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 7938431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A two-year clinical study of light-cured composite and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Barr-Agholme M; Odén A; Dahllöf G; Modeér T
    Dent Mater; 1991 Oct; 7(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 1814768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Materials used to restore class II lesions in primary molars: a survey of California pediatric dentists.
    Pair RL; Udin RD; Tanbonliong T
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 15646912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [ART or conventional restorations? A final evaluation of proximal restorations in deciduous molars].
    van den Dungen GM; Huddleston Slater AE; van Amerongen WE
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2004 Sep; 111(9):345-9. PubMed ID: 15495501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A two-year clinical study of a carvable composite resin used as class II restorations in primary molars.
    Tonn EM; Ryge G; Chambers DW
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1980; 47(6):405-13. PubMed ID: 7002965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of Class II combined amalgam-composite restorations in primary molars after 6 to 30 months.
    Holan G; Chosack A; Eidelman E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 8958346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial of beveled cavity preparations in primary molars: an 18-Month follow up.
    Oliveira CA; Dias PF; Dos Santos MP; Maia LC
    J Dent; 2008 Sep; 36(9):754-8. PubMed ID: 18579283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
    Markovic D; Peric T
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vitremer restorative cement for children: three clinicians' observations in three pediatric dental practices.
    Croll TP; Helpin ML; Donly KJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(6):391-8, 374. PubMed ID: 11204061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.