These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6948476)

  • 1. [Interproximal penetration potential of various bristle designs and degrees of hardness of toothbrushes].
    Nygaard-Ostby P; Evardsen S; Spydevold B
    ZWR; 1981 Jun; 90(6):36-43. PubMed ID: 6948476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of different toothpaste abrasives on the bristle end-rounding quality of toothbrushes.
    de Oliveira GJ; de Aveiro JM; Pavone C; Marcantonio RA
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 Feb; 13(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 24661364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Access to interproximal tooth surfaces by different bristle designs and stiffnesses of toothbrushes.
    Nygaard-Ostby P; Edvardsen S; Spydevold B
    Scand J Dent Res; 1979 Dec; 87(6):424-30. PubMed ID: 296565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative evaluation of the in vitro penetration performance of the improved Crest complete toothbrush versus the Current Crest complete toothbrush, the Colgate Precision toothbrush and the Oral-B P40 toothbrush.
    Volpenhein DW; Handel SE; Hughes TJ; Wild J
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9238881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative evaluation of the in vitro penetration performance of the improved Crest Complete toothbrush versus the Colgate Total toothbrush and the Oral-B Advantage toothbrush.
    Volpenhein DW; Hartman WL
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):101-5. PubMed ID: 9238886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of Bristle Stiffness of Manual Toothbrushes on Eroded and Sound Human Dentin--An In Vitro Study.
    Bizhang M; Riemer K; Arnold WH; Domin J; Zimmer S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153250. PubMed ID: 27070901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Use of hand-held toothbrushes with different positions and bristle strengths (technical and animal experiment studies].
    von Hahn GB; Spranger H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1982 Oct; 37(10):833-5. PubMed ID: 6958449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suggestion for a definition, measuring method and classification system of bristle stiffness of toothbrushes.
    Nygaard-Ostby P; Spydevold B; Edvardsen S
    Scand J Dent Res; 1979 Jun; 87(3):159-70. PubMed ID: 293880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effect of the bristle stiffness of toothbrushes on the force exerted, gingival damage and plaque removal].
    de Trey ER
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1983 Oct; 93(10):1007-16. PubMed ID: 6359401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laboratory evaluations of toothbrush interproximal penetration ratios.
    Yost KG; Miluszewski KF; Chen AC
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 4(4):125-7. PubMed ID: 8031481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The effect of toothbrushes on human dental enamel and dentin wear].
    Remizov SM; Pruzhanskiĭ LIu
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1990; (4):4-6. PubMed ID: 2251696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of manual toothbrushes with different brush field characteristics].
    Baluda MI; Vinnichenko IuA; Popovkina OA; Pakhomova IuV; Zhidkova IP
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2012; 91(3):38-41. PubMed ID: 22968611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bristle end rounding of manual toothbrushes and reproducibility of end rounding classification.
    Jung M; Koçkapan C; Wetzel WE
    Am J Dent; 2003 Oct; 16(5):299-304. PubMed ID: 14677607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Catalogue of tooth brush head designs.
    Voelker MA; Bayne SC; Liu Y; Walker MP
    J Dent Hyg; 2013 Jun; 87(3):118-33. PubMed ID: 23986328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toothbrush bristle wear and adherence of Streptococcus mutans.
    Goldsmith RN; Shey Z; Houpt MI; Fine D; Schreiner H; Greenberg B
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 17688023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bristle end-rounding in toothbrushes: a comparison of different evaluation techniques, bristle position and viewing angle.
    Meyer-Lueckel H; Kielbassa AM; Renz H; Hopfenmuller W
    J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 15218712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power toothbrushes. Efficacy of a unique gum protection system with an interproximal tip. Introduction.
    Heasman P
    J Clin Dent; 2001; 12(1):1. PubMed ID: 11475705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new method for in vitro evaluation of the interproximal penetration of manual toothbrushes.
    Volpenhein DW; Walsh ME; Dellerman PA; Burkett TA
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 5(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 8031486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interproximal access efficacy of three manual toothbrushes with extended, x-angled or flat multitufted bristles.
    Stiller S; Bosma ML; Shi X; Spirgel CM; Yankell SL
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2010 Aug; 8(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 20624196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro tooth cleaning efficacy of manual toothbrushes around brackets.
    Schätzle M; Imfeld T; Sener B; Schmidlin PR
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 19054810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.