These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6948741)

  • 1. Clinical performance of amalgam with high content of copper.
    Leinfelder KF
    Gen Dent; 1981; 29(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 6948741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The curing time of an anaerobic marginal sealant for amalgam restorations].
    Suehiro K
    Osaka Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1984 Jun; 29(1):201-15. PubMed ID: 6590820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of a new low gamma-2 amalgam.
    de Vries J; de Wet FA; Hardwick FK
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1984 Aug; 39(8):565-7. PubMed ID: 6594795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of mixing speed on the setting rate of high-copper amalgams.
    Brackett WW; Swartz ML; Moore BK; Clark HE
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1987 Aug; 115(2):289-92. PubMed ID: 3476653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some properties of high-copper amalgam alloys comparing hand and mechanical trituration.
    Iglesias AM; Sorensen SE; Carter JM; Wilko RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Aug; 52(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 6590838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Experimental evaluation of the behavior of amalgam with rapid setting, condensation and polishing in one sitting].
    Passi P; Miotti F
    Dent Cadmos; 1984 Oct; 52(10 Suppl):35, 38-40. PubMed ID: 6598769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of an ultrasonically-welded pre-dosed amalgam capsule for mercury leakage during trituration.
    Cooley RL; Barkmeier WW
    J Nebr Dent Assoc; 1984; 60(3):18-20, 23. PubMed ID: 6587006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical evaluation of a new amalgam with high copper content].
    Fiamminghi L; Marcoli PA; Benedetti M
    Dent Cadmos; 1984 Mar; 52(3 Suppl):61-5. PubMed ID: 6596205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Control of the clinical behavior of 4 amalgams using standardized macro- and microphotographic methods].
    Doglia R; Herr P; Holz J; Baume LJ
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1981 May; 91(5):329-48. PubMed ID: 6947415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Laboratory properties and clinical behavior of 3 amalgam alloys].
    Macchi RL; Osborne JW
    Rev Asoc Odontol Argent; 1983 Jul; 71(3):78-80. PubMed ID: 6587456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EFFECT OF PRECONDENSATION MERCURY CONTENT ON THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF AMALGAM.
    MAHLER DB; MITCHEM JC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1965 Sep; 71():593-600. PubMed ID: 14327164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microstructures of Cu-rich amalgam restorations with moderate clinical deterioration.
    Marshall GW; Marshall SJ; Letzel H; Vrijhoef MM
    Dent Mater; 1987 Jun; 3(3):135-43. PubMed ID: 3481587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of modern amalgams].
    Garro Barrio J
    Rev Esp Estomatol; 1982; 30(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 6963695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Is gamma-2-free amalgam in current a rational method for amalgam restoration? (II)].
    Lahme J
    Quintessenz; 1984 Jun; 35(6):1101-8. PubMed ID: 6592628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PIN RETENTION AMALGAM RESTORATIONS.
    WING G
    Aust Dent J; 1965 Feb; 10(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 14274161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Is gamma-2-free amalgam in current practice a rational method of amalgam restoration? (I)].
    Lahme J
    Quintessenz; 1984 May; 35(5):899-906. PubMed ID: 6592621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Clinical and outcome evaluation of amalgam fillings].
    Pilz ME
    Stomatol DDR; 1987 Feb; 37(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 3473781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical evaluation of old amalgam restorations].
    Sougiouklakis G; Patelarou N; Doubitsas G; Mountouris G
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1982; 36(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 6820132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Restoration of primary teeth with amalgam.
    Mathewson RJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 1984 Jan; 28(1):137-43. PubMed ID: 6584342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical and laboratory study comparing three amalgam alloys of random particle-size, mixed phase with one of conventional regular lathe-cut particles.
    Morris ME; Braham RL; Schmutz JR; Kahl EA
    Acta Odontol Pediatr; 1981 Dec; 2(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 6949492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.