These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6949125)

  • 1. Effect of quantum noise on the detection of incipient proximal caries.
    Okano T; Gröndahl HG; Gröndahl K; Webber RL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Feb; 53(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 6949125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Depth of occlusal caries assessed clinically, by conventional film radiographs, and by digitized, processed radiographs.
    Wenzel A; Fejerskov O; Kidd E; Joyston-Bechal S; Groeneveld A
    Caries Res; 1990; 24(5):327-33. PubMed ID: 2261604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical contrast enhancement of subtraction images for radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Gröndahl HG; Gröndahl K; Okano T; Webber RL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Feb; 53(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 7036033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of proximal carious lesions: two-film versus four-film bitewing radiography.
    Kaffe I; Gordon M; Laufer B; Littner MM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 May; 57(5):567-71. PubMed ID: 6587305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph. Film versus print.
    Otis LL; Sherman RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Mar; 136(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 15819345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical defects in dental enamel vs. natural dental caries: observer differentiation using Ektaspeed Plus film.
    Kang B-C ; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Caries Res; 1996; 30(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 8833141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial resolution requirements for digitizing dental radiographs.
    Kassebaum DK; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Waggener RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Jun; 67(6):760-9. PubMed ID: 2740097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs, and digitized radiographs.
    Wenzel A; Larsen MJ; Fejerskov O
    Caries Res; 1991; 25(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 1747887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10654032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
    Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of conventional intra-oral radiography and computer imaging techniques for the detection of proximal surface dental caries.
    Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Aug; 21(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 1397467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection and measurement of approximal radiolucencies by computer-aided image analysis.
    Pitts NB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Sep; 58(3):358-66. PubMed ID: 6592535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital enhancement of radiographs for assessment of interproximal dental caries.
    Seneadza V; Koob A; Kaltschmitt J; Staehle HJ; Duwenhoegger J; Eickholz P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Mar; 37(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 18316505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Ohki M; Okano T; Nakamura T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 7835507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of image magnification of digitized bitewing radiographs on approximal caries detection: an in vitro study.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 9161171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection.
    Ludlow JB; Abreu M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 10202475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiographic spatial frequencies essential to the diagnosis of incipient interproximal lesions.
    Webber RL; Koziol PH
    J Dent Res; 1976; 55(5):805-11. PubMed ID: 1067295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.