These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. [Faults in amalgam restorations, related to the cavity preparation]. de Lima MF; Galan Junior J Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac; 1967; 8(3):47-9. PubMed ID: 5613139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Advantages and procedures using air abrasion. Ross G Ont Dent; 1998 Mar; 75(2):36-9, 41-2. PubMed ID: 9656915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance of lower molars with Class 1 composite and amalgam restorations. Watts DC; el Mowafy OM; Grant AA Dent Mater; 1987 Oct; 3(5):261-4. PubMed ID: 3479363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth. Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture strength of restored premolars. Camacho GB; Gonçalves M; Nonaka T; Osório AB Am J Dent; 2007 Apr; 20(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 17542207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro studies of cusp reinforcement with adhesive restorative material. McCullock AJ; Smith BG Br Dent J; 1986 Dec; 161(12):450-2. PubMed ID: 3467766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of occlusion on the degradation of posterior composite resins. Leinfelder KF; Small B Dent Today; 1998 Nov; 17(11):44-50. PubMed ID: 10752417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites. Bremer BD; Geurtsen W Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 11699740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture strength of premolars with Class 2 silver amalgam restorations. el-Sherif MH; Halhoul MN; Kamar AA; Nour el-Din A Oper Dent; 1988; 13(2):50-3. PubMed ID: 3270038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years. Smales RJ; Wetherell JD Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials. Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Caries recurrence at the margin of silver amalgam restorations]. Poggio C; Lanati C Dent Cadmos; 1984 Jun; 52(6):49-52. PubMed ID: 6596222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness. Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Amalgam--Resurrection and redemption. Part 1: the clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam. Wahl MJ Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(7):525-35. PubMed ID: 11495565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]