BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6950165)

  • 1. Single oblique-view mammography for periodic screening for breast cancer in women.
    Lundgren B; Helleberg A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1982 Mar; 68(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 6950165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficiency of single-view mammography: rate of interval cancer cases.
    Lundgren B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1979 Apr; 62(4):799-803. PubMed ID: 285293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-view mammography screening. Three-year follow-up of interval cancer cases.
    Lundgren B; Jakobsson S
    Radiology; 1979 Jan; 130(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 758637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
    Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
    Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overdiagnosis by mammographic screening for breast cancer studied in birth cohorts in The Netherlands.
    Ripping TM; Verbeek AL; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ; van Ravesteyn NT; Broeders MJ
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Aug; 137(4):921-9. PubMed ID: 25612892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Overdiagnosis in mammography screening].
    Zahl PH; Maehlen J
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 Sep; 124(17):2238-9. PubMed ID: 15356688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer screening with mammography: a population-based, randomized trial with mammography as the only screening mode.
    Andersson I; Andrén L; Hildell J; Linell F; Ljungqvist U; Pettersson H
    Radiology; 1979 Aug; 132(2):273-6. PubMed ID: 461778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast cancer in women 65-74 years old: earlier detection by mammographic screening.
    Gabriel H; Wilson TE; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jan; 168(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 8976913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of interval breast cancer rates for two-versus single-view screening mammography: a population-based study.
    Seigneurin A; Exbrayat C; Labarère J; Colonna M
    Breast; 2009 Oct; 18(5):284-8. PubMed ID: 19713113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-specific interval breast cancers in New South Wales and meta-analysis of studies of women aged 40-49 years.
    Taylor R; Page A; Bampton D; Estoesta J; Rickard M
    J Med Screen; 2004; 11(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 15563775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening for breast cancer in Nijmegen. Report of 6 screening rounds, 1975-1986.
    Peeters PH; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; van Bon MJ
    Int J Cancer; 1989 Feb; 43(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 2917799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response of women aged 65-74 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study in London, UK.
    Horton Taylor D; McPherson K; Parbhoo S; Perry N
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1996 Feb; 50(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 8762359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening mammography: the Mount Sinai BreastCheck experience.
    Moskowitz H; Kron E; Hall D
    Conn Med; 1993 Dec; 57(12):777-80. PubMed ID: 8149736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors associated with repeat mammography screening.
    Halabi S; Skinner CS; Samsa GP; Strigo TS; Crawford YS; Rimer BK
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Dec; 49(12):1104-12. PubMed ID: 11132060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementation of service screening with mammography in Sweden: from pilot study to nationwide programme.
    Olsson S; Andersson I; Karlberg I; Bjurstam N; Frodis E; Håkansson S
    J Med Screen; 2000; 7(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 10807141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield.
    Helvie MA; Pennes DR; Rebner M; Adler DD
    Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):155-8. PubMed ID: 1984295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Compliance with mammography recommendations at the work site.
    Goodspeed RB; DeLucia AG; Parravano J; Goldfield N
    J Occup Med; 1988 Jan; 30(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 3351640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
    Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification.
    Burhenne HJ; Burhenne LW; Goldberg F; Hislop TG; Worth AJ; Rebbeck PM; Kan L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1067-71; discussion 1072-5. PubMed ID: 8165983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.