BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6950584)

  • 1. [Age- and sex-specific analysis of dentomaxillofacial measurements in children with normal and abnormal dental findings. 5. Intercanine distance in the upper and lower jaw].
    Graf H; Koch EM
    Stomatol DDR; 1981 Dec; 31(12):909-13. PubMed ID: 6950584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Age- and sex-specific analysis of dentomaxillofacial measurements in children with normal and abnormal dental findings. 4. Anterior and posterior dental arch width in the upper and lower jaws].
    Koch EM; Graf H
    Stomatol DDR; 1981 Oct; 31(10):753-9. PubMed ID: 6949346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Age- and sex-specific analysis of dentomaxillofacial measurements in children with normal and abnormal dental findings. 2. Mesiodistal and faciolingual crown diameters in the permanent anterior teeth].
    Koch EM; Graf H
    Stomatol DDR; 1981 Aug; 31(8):633-6. PubMed ID: 6948452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Age- and sex-specific analysis of dentomaxillofacial measurements in children with normal and abnormal dental findings. 3. Sagittal and vertical relations of the anterior teeth].
    Graf H; Koch EM
    Stomatol DDR; 1981 Sep; 31(9):659-64. PubMed ID: 6948455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Age- and sex-specific analysis of dentomaxillofacial measurements in children with normal and abnormal dental findings. 1. Problems concerning norms and variability in the orofacial region].
    Graf H; Koch EM
    Stomatol DDR; 1981 Jul; 31(7):487-91. PubMed ID: 6976648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Age- and sex-specific analysis of the dentomaxillofacial measures in children with normal and abnormal dental findings. 7. Morphological facial height and lower facial height].
    Graf H; Koch EM; Zellner K; Jaeger U
    Stomatol DDR; 1982 Feb; 32(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 6956034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Age- and sex-specific analysis of dentomaxillofacial measurements in children with normal and abnormal dental findings. 6. Width of the zygoma and the mandibular angle].
    Koch EM; Graf H; Jaeger U; Zellner K
    Stomatol DDR; 1982 Jan; 32(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 6952621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of sucking habits, cohort, sex, intercanine arch widths, and breast or bottle feeding on posterior crossbite in Norwegian and Swedish 3-year-old children.
    Ogaard B; Larsson E; Lindsten R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 8059752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of dental arch measurements in the primary dentition between contemporary and historic samples.
    Warren JJ; Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 11244414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Canine tip marker: a simplified tool for measuring intercanine distance.
    Tripathi S; Aeran H; Yadav S; Singh SP; Singh RD; Chand P
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 21627709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of arch length based on intercanine width.
    Paulino V; Paredes V; Gandia JL; Cibrian R
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 18263887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of children with unilateral posterior crossbite, treated and untreated, in the deciduous dentition--occlusal and skeletal characteristics of significance in predicting the long-term outcome.
    Thilander B; Lennartsson B
    J Orofac Orthop; 2002 Sep; 63(5):371-83. PubMed ID: 12297966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multi-dimensional orthodontic and prosthodontic study cast analysis.
    Byland J
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2003; 14(3):9-14. PubMed ID: 14596154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in length and width of the mandibular arch from the mixed dentition completion of the permanent dentition.
    Maj G; Alleva F; Lucchese FP
    Eur J Orthod; 1979; 1(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 298211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphologic factors in open bite and deep bite.
    Trouten JC; Enlow DH; Rabine M; Phelps AE; Swedlow D
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Jul; 53(3):192-211. PubMed ID: 6579870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overjet, overbite, intercanine distance and root resorption in orthodontically treated patients. A ten year follow-up study.
    Rönnerman A; Larsson E
    Swed Dent J; 1981; 5(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 6943732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of inter-canine width in late lower arch crowding.
    Richardson ME
    Br J Orthod; 1994 Feb; 21(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8199165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of Pont's Index to a Jordanian population.
    Al-Omari IK; Duaibis RB; Al-Bitar ZB
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):627-31. PubMed ID: 17971353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Morphology of the dentition in young adults. An epidemiological study on Finnish students.
    Laine T
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1984; 80 Suppl 3-4():1-42. PubMed ID: 6514709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intercanine distance in the analysis of bite marks: a comparison of human and domestic dog dental arches.
    Tedeschi-Oliveira SV; Trigueiro M; Oliveira RN; Melani RF
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2011 Jul; 29(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 21841266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.