These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6951024)

  • 1. Observation and comparison of polished composite surfaces with the aid of SEM and profilometer.
    Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Oral Rehabil; 1982 Mar; 9(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 6951024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observation and comparison of polished composite surfaces with the aid of SEM and profilometer. II. Following tooth cleaning procedures.
    Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Oral Rehabil; 1982 May; 9(3):203-16. PubMed ID: 6954257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites.
    Antonson SA; Yazici AR; Kilinc E; Antonson DE; Hardigan PC
    J Dent; 2011 Jul; 39 Suppl 1():e9-17. PubMed ID: 21256180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites.
    Paravina RD; Roeder L; Lu H; Vogel K; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 15478488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface Roughness and Gloss of Actual Composites as Polished With Different Polishing Systems.
    Rodrigues-Junior SA; Chemin P; Piaia PP; Ferracane JL
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(4):418-29. PubMed ID: 25268040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites.
    Da Costa J; Ferracane J; Paravina RD; Mazur RF; Roeder L
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(4):214-24; discussion 225-6. PubMed ID: 17635330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of a glaze/composite sealant on the 3-D surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
    Perez Cdos R; Hirata RJ; da Silva AH; Sampaio EM; de Miranda MS
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(6):674-80. PubMed ID: 19953776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy.
    Daud A; Gray G; Lynch CD; Wilson NHF; Blum IR
    J Dent; 2018 Apr; 71():25-30. PubMed ID: 29360492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials.
    Uçtaşli MB; Arisu HD; Omürlü H; Eligüzeloğlu E; Ozcan S; Ergun G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17277831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing.
    Jung M; Eichelberger K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17695607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface roughness of new microhybrid resin-based composites.
    Gedik R; Hürmüzlü F; Coşkun A; Bektaş OO; Ozdemir AK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Aug; 136(8):1106-12. PubMed ID: 16161365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after polishing.
    Jung M; Bruegger H; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 14653299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems.
    Ergücü Z; Türkün LS
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 17427829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the surface hardness, roughness, gloss and color of composites after different finishing/polishing treatments and thermocycling using a multitechnique approach.
    Pala K; Tekçe N; Tuncer S; Serim ME; Demirci M
    Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(2):278-89. PubMed ID: 27041019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surface roughness of one nanofill and one silorane composite after polishing.
    Buchgraber B; Kqiku L; Allmer N; Jakopic G; Städtler P
    Coll Antropol; 2011 Sep; 35(3):879-83. PubMed ID: 22053571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.
    Hoelscher DC; Neme AM; Pink FE; Hughes PJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9610331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.