These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6951042)

  • 21. The effect of one-step vs. two-step impression techniques on long-term accuracy and dimensional stability when the finish line is within the gingival sulcular area.
    Levartovsky S; Zalis M; Pilo R; Harel N; Ganor Y; Brosh T
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 23734561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques.
    Nissan J; Laufer BZ; Brosh T; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 10668027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; O'mahony AM; Spencer P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 14564291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection.
    Kronström MH; Johnson GH; Hompesch RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20105678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An evaluation of the time-dependent dimensional stability of eleven elastomeric impression materials.
    Williams PT; Jackson DG; Bergman W
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Jul; 52(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 6379155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surface porosity of stone casts made from vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Dhuru VB; Asgharnia MK; Mayer JC; Hassan K
    Oper Dent; 1986; 11(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 3459135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modification of immediate denture sectional impression technique using vinyl polysiloxane.
    Gardner LK; Parr GR; Rahn AO
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Aug; 64(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 2202817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of impression materials measured with a vertical height gauge.
    Lewinstein I; Craig RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 1990 Jul; 17(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 2213324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 'The effect of latex gloves on setting time of vinyl polysiloxane putty impression material'.
    Burke FJ; Causton BE; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 1989 Sep; 167(5):158. PubMed ID: 2789880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ability of various impression materials to produce duplicate dies from successive impressions.
    Morgano SM; Milot P; Ducharme P; Rose L
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 7783010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantification of hydrogen gas released from polyvinylsiloxane impression materials in contact with die stone materials.
    McCrosson J; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Anderson RA
    J Dent; 1987 Jun; 15(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 3475300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
    Mishra S; Chowdhary R
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automixing: a new concept in elastomeric impression material delivery systems.
    Keck SC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Oct; 54(4):479-83. PubMed ID: 3900344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of reheating on the accuracy of addition silicone putty-wash impressions.
    Tjan AH; Li T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 2072314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-term dimensional stability of three current elastomers.
    Clancy JM; Scandrett FR; Ettinger RL
    J Oral Rehabil; 1983 Jul; 10(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 6577158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of a chemical disinfectant on the physical properties of dental stones.
    Hall BD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Naylor WP; Sy J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15008235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A one-step putty-wash impression technique utilizing vinyl polysiloxanes.
    Pameijer CH
    Quintessence Int Dent Dig; 1983 Aug; 14(8):861-3. PubMed ID: 6374732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Compatibility of a new epoxy resin with impression materials.
    Schelb E; Baracat SA; Almaguer R
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 2076244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.