These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6953905)

  • 21. Brain-stem audiometry in infants and children.
    Rosenhamer HJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (Suppl 8):197-201. PubMed ID: 299104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The latency of auditory nerve-brainstem responses in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Sohmer H; Kinarti R; Gafni M
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 230(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 7295179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Threshold prediction from the auditory 40-Hz evoked potential.
    Lynn JM; Lesner SA; Sandridge SA; Daddario CC
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(6):366-70. PubMed ID: 6510584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Auditory brainstem responses in a case of high-frequency conductive hearing loss.
    Gorga MP; Reiland JK; Beauchaine KA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 Nov; 50(4):346-50. PubMed ID: 4057976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Brainstem response audiometry. I. Its use in distinguishing between conductive and cochlear hearing loss.
    vd Drift JF; Brocaar MP; von Zanten GA
    Audiology; 1988; 27(5):260-70. PubMed ID: 3190566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Current pediatric audiology].
    Heinemann M; Döring WH
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol Suppl; 1986; 2():6-18. PubMed ID: 3469949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. IV. Interaural latency differences (wave V) in cochlear hearing loss.
    Rosenhamer HJ; Lindström B; Lundborg T
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 7280543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Brain stem evoked response audiometry study with a bone conduction receiver in atresia of the auditory canal and microtia].
    Flämig P; Gerull G; Mrowinski D
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Feb; 68(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 2706066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of change of stimulus frequency on the prediction of audiograms.
    Jerger J; Hayes D
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():729-30. PubMed ID: 6953909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Brainstem electric-response audiometry in infants of a neonatal intensive care unit.
    Durieux-Smith A; Picton TW; Edwards CG; MacMurray B; Goodman JT
    Audiology; 1987; 26(5):284-97. PubMed ID: 3675312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Crib-O-Gram vs. auditory brain stem response for infant hearing screening.
    Shimizu H; Walters RJ; Kennedy DW; Allen MC; Markowitz RK; Luebkert FR
    Laryngoscope; 1985 Jul; 95(7 Pt 1):806-10. PubMed ID: 4010420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The indication for brain stem evoked response and the effect of click rate and stimulus intensity on the latencies of the auditory evoked potentials (author's transl)].
    Baschek V; Steinert W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Oct; 59(10):690-7. PubMed ID: 7453423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the auditory system: an update.
    Brackmann DE; Forquer BD
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1983; 92(6 Pt 1):651-6. PubMed ID: 6660758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On-line computer scoring of the auditory brainstem response for estimation of hearing threshold.
    Mason SM
    Audiology; 1984; 23(3):277-96. PubMed ID: 6732632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Survey of attempts to use auditory evoked potentials to obtain an audiogram. Review article.
    Sohmer H; Kinarti R
    Br J Audiol; 1984 Nov; 18(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 6395931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Usefulness of 1000 Hz tone-burst-evoked responses in the diagnosis of acoustic neuroma.
    Telian SA; Kileny PR
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1989 Oct; 101(4):466-71. PubMed ID: 2508024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Low-frequency hearing loss: auditory brainstem response-derived band analysis.
    Mair IW; Laukli E
    Audiology; 1986; 25(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 3753307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [On the reliability of brainstem electric response audiometry (BERA)].
    Renne C; Olthoff A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Sep; 91(9):571-6. PubMed ID: 22851217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory evoked potential: clinical applications of brainstem electric response audiometry.
    Cummings RJ; Schroder TL
    J Kans Med Soc; 1980 Jan; 81(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 7351505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.