These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6954257)

  • 1. Observation and comparison of polished composite surfaces with the aid of SEM and profilometer. II. Following tooth cleaning procedures.
    Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Oral Rehabil; 1982 May; 9(3):203-16. PubMed ID: 6954257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observation and comparison of polished composite surfaces with the aid of SEM and profilometer.
    Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Oral Rehabil; 1982 Mar; 9(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 6951024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of surface roughness values of various restorative materials after brushing with blue covarine containing whitening toothpaste by two different methods: AFM and profilometer.
    Yılmaz C; Kanık Ö
    Microsc Res Tech; 2022 Feb; 85(2):521-532. PubMed ID: 34528740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface roughness of different dental materials before and after simulated toothbrushing in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):617-26. PubMed ID: 16268397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface roughness of composites and hybrid ionomers.
    Tate WH; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8957918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
    Neme AL; Frazier KB; Roeder LB; Debner TL
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 11817469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of chemical and mechanical degradation on surface roughness of three glass ionomers and a nanofilled resin composite.
    Carvalho FG; Sampaio CS; Fucio SB; Carlo HL; Correr-Sobrinho L; Puppin-Rontani RM
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 22433031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion.
    Tanoue N; Matsumura H; Atsuta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 10898845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of three bleaching agents on the surface properties of three different esthetic restorative materials.
    Turker SB; Biskin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):466-73. PubMed ID: 12806324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.
    Hoelscher DC; Neme AM; Pink FE; Hughes PJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9610331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of toothbrushing on surface gloss of resin composites.
    Lefever D; Perakis N; Roig M; Krejci I; Ardu S
    Am J Dent; 2012 Feb; 25(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 22558694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of two anti-erosion pastes on surface roughness of different restorative materials.
    Tirali RE; Çehreli SB; Yazici R; Yalçinkaya Z
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 23758464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of surface roughness of nanofilled and microhybrid composite resins after curing and polishing].
    Jiang H; Lv D; Liu K; Zhang W; Yao Y; Liao C
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2014 May; 34(5):727-30. PubMed ID: 24849446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of toothbrushing on a hybrid composite resin.
    Goldstein GR; Lerner T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Oct; 66(4):498-500. PubMed ID: 1791560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of selected mouthwashes on the surface roughness of resin modified glass-ionomer restorative materials.
    Sadaghiani L; Wilson MA; Wilson NH
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 16530262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of artificial saliva and APF gel on the surface roughness of newer glass ionomer cements.
    Yip HK; To WM; Smales RJ
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):661-8. PubMed ID: 15646222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.